How Important is the Tunnel Position in Outcomes Post-ACL Reconstruction: A 3D CT-Based Study

BackgroundDrilling the femoral and tibial tunnels at their anatomical locations are critical for good outcomes and involve seeing the footprints well. We intended to compare two techniques of drilling the tunnels and the patient-reported outcomes and knee stability of patients undergoing single bundle ACL reconstruction using 3D CT to evaluate if the tunnels were anatomical or not.Materials and MethodsSixty single bundle ACL reconstructions were analyzed, 30 each with Technique A and B. Pre-operative and after a minimum 27 month follow-up Lysholm, IKDC, Tegner score, hop test, and Lachman test were noted. 3D CT was done to classify femoral tunnels positions as being well placed, slightly or grossly misplaced and tibial tunnels as optimal or suboptimal and compared.ResultsSixty ACL reconstructions had full follow-up with a mean follow-up of 34 months. There was no significant difference between tunnel positions between the two techniques. Well-placed femoral tunnel had better Lysholm score (62.2 ± 16.2 v/s 48.5 ± 17.2, p 0.002) and IKDC score (62.5 ± 14.3 v/s 52.7 ± 15.1, p 0.012).). Those who had their surgeries within 3 months of their injury had better hop test (4.4 ± 0.9 v/s 3.9 ± 1, p 0.034) and IKDC scores (62.5 ± 15.8 v/s 33.2 ± 13.8, p 0.026) as compared to those that had surgery done after 3 monthsConclusionTibial tunnel positions were optimal in most cases and did not differ between the two techniques. Well-placed femoral tunnels and surgeries done within 3 months of the injury produced best results.