首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

开放手术与关节镜辅助手术治疗膝关节脱位的疗效比较
引用本文:何进文,赵大成,耿彬,滕元君,张成俊,吴萌,韵向东,汉华,夏亚一. 开放手术与关节镜辅助手术治疗膝关节脱位的疗效比较[J]. 中华创伤杂志, 2021, 0(2): 114-121
作者姓名:何进文  赵大成  耿彬  滕元君  张成俊  吴萌  韵向东  汉华  夏亚一
作者单位:兰州大学第二医院骨科
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(81874017,81960403,82060405,82060413)。
摘    要:目的 比较开放手术与关节镜辅助手术治疗膝关节脱位的临床疗效.方法 采用回顾性病例对照研究分析2013年5月至2019年9月兰州大学第二医院收治的80例膝关节脱位患者的临床资料,其中男59例,女21例;年龄18~66岁[(42.5 ± 11.6)岁].49例行开放多韧带重建术(开放组),31例行关节镜辅助多韧带重建术(关...

关 键 词:膝关节  脱位  韧带  关节镜  开放

Comparative study of open surgery and arthroscopic assisted surgery in management of knee dislocations
He Jinwen,Zhao Dacheng,Geng Bin,Teng Yuanjun,Zhang Chengjun,Wu Meng,Yun Xiangdong,Han Hua,Xia Yayi. Comparative study of open surgery and arthroscopic assisted surgery in management of knee dislocations[J]. Chinese Journal of Traumatology, 2021, 0(2): 114-121
Authors:He Jinwen  Zhao Dacheng  Geng Bin  Teng Yuanjun  Zhang Chengjun  Wu Meng  Yun Xiangdong  Han Hua  Xia Yayi
Affiliation:(Department of Orthopedics,Second Hospital of Lanzhou University,Orthopedic Clinical Research Center of Gansu Province,Orthopedic Key Laboratory of Gansu Province,Lanzhou 730030,China)
Abstract:Objective To compare the efficacy of open surgery and arthroscopic assisted surgery in treatment of knee dislocations.Methods A retrospective case-control study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 80 patients with knee dislocations admitted to Second Hospital of Lanzhou University from May 2013 to September 2019,including 59 males and 21 females,aged 18-66 years[(42.5±11.6)years].Open multiple ligament reconstruction was performed in 49 patients(open group)and arthroscopic assisted multiple ligament reconstruction was performed in 31 patients(arthroscopic group).The postoperative hospitalization days,incidence of complications,time needed for recovery of knee range of motion(>0°,>90°,>120°),and time to complete weight-bearing were compared between the two groups.The Lysholm score,international knee documentation committee(IKDC)subjective knee form,Tegner activity level,score of the MOS item short-form health survey(SF-36),patient satisfaction and knee range of motion were compared between the two groups at the last follow-up.Results All the patients were followed up for 1.2-7.4 years[(3.8±1.5)years].There was no significant difference in postoperative hospitalization days or incidence of complications between the two groups(P>0.05).No significant difference was found in time needed for recovery of knee range of motion(>0°,>120°)or time to complete weight-bearing(P>0.05).The time needed for recovery of knee range of motion(>90°)was 90(60,90)days in open group and 60(30,90)days in arthroscopic group(P<0.05).At the last follow-up,there was no significant difference in Lysholm score,IKDC subjective score,Tegner activity level,SF-36 score,or patient satisfaction between the two groups(P>0.05).At the last follow-up,the knee range of motion was 120°(90°,130°)in open group and 135°(120°,140°)in arthroscopic group(P<0.05).Conclusion For treatment of knee dislocations,open surgery and arthroscopic assisted surgery have similar results in the long-term effect,while arthroscopic assisted surgery has benefits in early rehabilitation and ultimately better knee range of motion.
Keywords:Knee joint  Dislocations  Ligaments  Arthroscopes  Open
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号