The role of Toll‐like receptors 2 and 4 on reactive oxygen species and nitric oxide production by macrophage cells stimulated with root canal pathogens |
| |
Authors: | L G Marcato A P Ferlini R C F Bonfim M L Ramos‐Jorge C Ropert L F C Afonso L Q Vieira A P R Sobrinho |
| |
Institution: | 1. Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil;2. René Rachou Research Center, Fiocruz, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil;3. Department of Mathematics, Institute of Exact Sciences, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, MG, Brazil;4. Department of Biochemistry and Immunology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil |
| |
Abstract: | Introduction: Periapical lesions arise as a result of the activation and interaction of the host immune responses against root canal infection. Recently identified Toll‐like receptors (TLR) seem to be involved in the recognition and development of immune responses against a myriad of microorganisms. However, very little information is available on the role of TLR in the induction of periapical lesions. Method: The role of TLR‐2 and TLR‐4 in the activation of murine macrophages stimulated using Fusobacterium nucleatum and Peptostreptococcus anaerobius was investigated. The production of nitric oxide (NO) and reactive oxygen species (ROS) was assessed. Results: The results demonstrate that TLR‐2 and TLR‐4 are involved in the production of ROS by activated macrophages. The microorganisms induced similar levels of NO production by TLR‐2‐competent and TLR‐2‐deficient macrophages, regardless of the addition of interferon‐γ (IFN‐γ), ruling out a role for TLR‐2 in the NO production induced by these bacteria. Only P. anaerobius induced NO production by TLR‐4‐competent macrophages without the addition of IFN‐γ. However, after IFN‐γ addition, F. nucleatum induced macrophage NO production. Therefore, NO production stimulated by IFN‐γ and these microorganisms seems to be TLR‐4‐independent. Conclusion: TLR‐2 seems to be involved in the induction of ROS production by macrophages in response to prevalent root canal bacteria, while only F. nucleatum induced ROS production by TLR‐4‐competent macrophages. Both microorganisms significantly induced large amounts of NO independent of TLR‐2 and TLR‐4. We conclude that microorganisms may participate in the induction and progression of periapical lesions through NO and ROS production by activated macrophages. |
| |
Keywords: | Innate immunity nitric oxide reactive oxygen species root canal infection Toll‐like receptors |
|
|