| 3种不同方案治疗精神分裂症的成本-效果分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 钱东丽,潘保中,杨广声.3种不同方案治疗精神分裂症的成本-效果分析[J].中国医院用药评价与分析,2004,4(2):110-111. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 钱东丽 潘保中 杨广声 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 新乡医学院第二附属医院精神药理教研室,新乡市,453002 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的:评价不同方案治疗精神分裂症的经济效果.方法:对132例精神分裂症住院患者分别用3种不同的治疗方案:A组用氯氮平;B组用利培酮;C组用奎硫平.运用药物经济学用成本-效果分析方法比较.结果:3种方案的疗效无显著差异(P＞0.05),B方案成本-效果比最低.结论:B组治疗方案是3种治疗精神分裂症方案中较优的治疗方案.
|
| 关 键 词： | 成本-效果分析 精神分裂症 氯氮平 利培酮 奎硫平 |
| 文章编号： | 1672-2124(2004)02-0110-02 |
| 修稿时间： | 2003年12月15 |
Cost - effectiveness Analysis of 3 Kinds of Therapeutic Schemes for Schizophrenia |
| |
| QIAN Dongli,PAN Baozhong,YANG Guangsheng.Cost - effectiveness Analysis of 3 Kinds of Therapeutic Schemes for Schizophrenia[J].Evaluation and Analysis of Drug-Use in Hospital of China,2004,4(2):110-111. |
| |
| Authors: | QIAN Dongli PAN Baozhong YANG Guangsheng |
| |
| Abstract: | OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the economic effectiveness in three different therapeutic schemes for schizophrenia.METHODS:132 patients with schizophrenia were divided into 3 groups,They received different therapeutic scheme:A:clozapine;B:risperidone;C:quetiapine.RESULTS:There was no significant difference among three different therapeutic schemes( P >0 05).Cost-effectiveness ratio of scheme B is the lowest.CONCLUSION:scheme B is the best one among the different therapeutic schemes for depression. |
| |
| Keywords: | cost-effectiveness analysis schizophrenia clozapine risperidone quetiapine |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
