首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

乳腺癌根治术后芬太尼、曲马多与吗啡病人自控镇痛的比较
引用本文:朱定成,袁世荧.乳腺癌根治术后芬太尼、曲马多与吗啡病人自控镇痛的比较[J].肿瘤防治研究,2008,35(1):55-57.
作者姓名:朱定成  袁世荧
作者单位:430022 武汉,华中科技大学同济医学院附属 协和医院麻醉学教研室( 3 现工作单位: 430079 武汉,湖北 省肿瘤医院麻醉科)
摘    要:目的观察比较乳腺癌根治术后芬太尼、曲马多病人自控静脉镇痛(PCIA)与吗啡病人自控硬膜外镇痛(PCEA)临床镇痛效果与副作用。方法选择乳腺癌根治病人180例。A8A(美国麻醉医师协会)分级Ⅰ~Ⅳ级,年龄28~70岁,随机分三组:F(芬太尼)组60例,芬太尼1.0mg+咪达唑仑10mg+阿扎司琼10mg+0.9%生理盐水至100mlPCIA;T(曲马多)组60例,曲马多1000mg+氟哌利多5mg+0.9%生理盐水至100ITIlPCIA;M(吗啡)组60例,吗啡5mg+氟哌利多5mg+布比卡因150mg+0.9%生理盐水至100ITIlPCEA。采用韩国奥美泵AUTOMEN2300,设定持续输注2ml/h,单次PCA剂量0.5ml,锁定时间15min。术后48小时观察病人药物用量、镇静评分(SS)镇痛评分(VAS),满意水平及副作用。结果F组48小时芬太尼用量(1.0±0)mg,按键次数(8±1.5)次,T组48小时曲马多用量(908.2±59.7)mg,按键次数(6.5±1.5)次;M组48小时吗啡用量(5.0±0)mg,按键次数0次。镇痛效果:VAS及SS评分无显著性差异,优良率〉97%。满意度无显著性差异。副作用:F组与T组病人恶心、呕吐发生率明显低于M组(P〈0.05),M组皮肤瘙瘁发生率25%,恶心,呕吐发生率28%。呼吸循环变化三组无明显差异(P〉0.05)。结论芬太尼、曲马多PCIA与吗啡PCEA镇痛效果确切,但在副反应方面芬太尼、曲马多PCIA相对较少。

关 键 词:芬太尼  曲马多  吗啡病人自  控镇痛  乳腺癌根治术  
文章编号:1000-8578(2008)01-0055-03
收稿时间:2006-12-22
修稿时间:2007-09-17

Clinical Study of Patient Controlled Analgesia with Intravenous Fentanyl and Tramadol and Epidural Morphine after Radical Mastectomy of Breast Cancer
ZHU Ding-cheng,YUAN Shi-ying.Clinical Study of Patient Controlled Analgesia with Intravenous Fentanyl and Tramadol and Epidural Morphine after Radical Mastectomy of Breast Cancer[J].Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment,2008,35(1):55-57.
Authors:ZHU Ding-cheng  YUAN Shi-ying
Institution:Department of A nesthesiolog y , Union Hos pi tal , Tong j i Medical Col lege , Huaz hong Uni versi t y of Sci2 ence and Technology , Wuhan 430022 , China ( 3 Present : Department of A nesthesiology , Hubei Cancer Hos pi tal ,Wuhan 430079)
Abstract:Objective  To compare the pain relief efficacy and complication of Fentanyl and Tramadol int ra2 venous PCA( PCIA) with morphine epidural PCA ( PCEA) . Methods  One hundred and eighteen Ameri2 can Society of Ananesthetist SA Ⅰ~ Ⅳpatient s ages 35~70 years scheduled for radical mastectomy were divided randomlyinto three groups : Group F ( n = 60) PCIA2Fentanyl 1. 0 mg + Midazolam 10 mg + azas2 t ron 10 mg + 0. 9 % N. S to 100 ml ; Group T ( n = 60) PCIA2Tramadol 1000 mg + Droperidol 5 mg + 0. 9 % N. S to 100 ml ; Group M ( n = 60) PCEA2Morphine 1 mg + Droperidol 5 mg + Bupivacaine 150 mg + 0. 9 % N. S to 100 ml. PCA (Automen 2300 bung of Korea) was commenced to the end of agery and continucd for 48 h ,PCA settings was : bolus dose of 0. 5 ml , background infusion of 2 ml/ h , lockout time of 15 min. The following parameters were recorded : dosage of drugs , VAS , SS , patient’ s satisfactions and complications. Results  Fentanyl (1. 0 ±0) mg , press key (8 ±1. 5) ; Tramadol (908. 2 ±59. 7) mg , press key (6. 0 ±1. 5) ; morphine (5. 0 ±0) mg , press key 0. There was no significant difference between PCIA and PCEA in VAS , SS and patient satisfaction rate ( > 97 %) . The rate of nausea and vomiting in group F and T was significantly lower than that of group M ( P < 0. 05) , group M tickle 25 % , nausea and vomiting 28 %. There was no significant difference among three groups in respiratory and circulation ( P > 0. 05) . Conclusion  PCIA with fentanyl and t ramadol is better than PCEA with morphine , which might be lower in the rate of complications .
Keywords:Fentanyl  Tramadol  Morphine  PCA  Radical mastectomy of breast cancer
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《肿瘤防治研究》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《肿瘤防治研究》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号