首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

手术与经皮消融治疗复发性肝母细胞瘤的疗效比较
引用本文:蒋宏,王瑗琪,肖晗,梁锐明,陈淑玲,周路遥,陈华东,钟志海,匡铭,刘钧澄.手术与经皮消融治疗复发性肝母细胞瘤的疗效比较[J].中华医学超声杂志,2022,19(9):962-967.
作者姓名:蒋宏  王瑗琪  肖晗  梁锐明  陈淑玲  周路遥  陈华东  钟志海  匡铭  刘钧澄
作者单位:1. 510080 广州,中山大学附属第一医院小儿外科2. 510080 广州,中山大学附属第一医院肝外科3. 510080 广州,中山大学附属第一医院超声介入科4. 510080 广州,中山大学附属第一医院临床研究中心5. 510080 广州,中山大学附属第一医院肝外科;510080 广州,中山大学附属第一医院超声介入科;510080 广州,中山大学附属第一医院肿瘤中心;510080 广州,中山大学附属第一医院精准研究中心
基金项目:广州市健康医疗协同创新重大专项(201704020215)
摘    要:目的比较手术与经皮消融在复发性肝母细胞瘤(HB)患儿中的疗效。 方法回顾性分析于2013年1月至2019年3月在中山大学附属第一医院接受手术(14例)或经皮消融(8例)治疗的22例复发性HB患儿。利用t检验、Wilcox秩和检验、χ2检验等方法比较2组患儿的基线指标或并发症发生率的差异,绘制首次复发治疗后患儿的生存曲线,并利用Log-rank检验比较2组患儿的3年总体生存率及无事件生存率的差异。 结果2组患儿的基线指标比较差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。消融组和手术组患儿的3年总体生存率分别为75.0%和78.6%(P=0.814),3年无事件生存率分别为50.0%和40.0%(P=0.880)。并发症发生率手术组较消融组更高(78.6% vs 25.0%),差异具有统计学意义(χ2=6.044,P=0.026)。2组患儿均无严重并发症发生。 结论经皮消融治疗复发性HB安全有效,与二次手术相比预后无明显差异。

关 键 词:肝母细胞瘤,复发性  手术治疗  经皮消融  
收稿时间:2020-06-28

Efficacy of re-hepatectomy versus percutaneous ablation in treatment of recurrent hepatoblastoma
Hong Jiang,Yuanqi Wang,Han Xiao,Ruiming Liang,Shuling Chen,Luyao Zhou,Huadong Chen,Zhihai Zhong,Ming Kuang,Juncheng Liu.Efficacy of re-hepatectomy versus percutaneous ablation in treatment of recurrent hepatoblastoma[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound,2022,19(9):962-967.
Authors:Hong Jiang  Yuanqi Wang  Han Xiao  Ruiming Liang  Shuling Chen  Luyao Zhou  Huadong Chen  Zhihai Zhong  Ming Kuang  Juncheng Liu
Abstract:ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy of re-hepatectomy and percutaneous ablation in the treatment of recurrent hepatoblastoma (HB). MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 22 recurrent HB patients who received re-hepatectomy (n=14) or percutaneous ablation (n=8) at the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from January 2013 to March 2019. The baseline characteristics and rate of complications were compared by the t-test, Wilcoxon test, or χ2-test according to the data type. Survival curves of children after first relapse treatment were drawn, and 3-year overall survival and event-free survival in the two groups were compared using the log-rank test. ResultsThere were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups. The 3-year overall survival rate in the ablation group and re-hepatectomy group was 75.0% and 78.6% (P=0.814), and the 3-year event-free survival rate was 50.0% and 40.0%, respectively (P=0.880). No severe complications occurred in either group. The rate of complications was significantly higher in the surgery group than in the ablation group (78.6% vs 25.0%, χ2=6.044, P=0.026). ConclusionPercutaneous ablation for recurrent HB is safe and effective, with no significant difference in prognosis compared with secondary surgery.
Keywords:Hepatoblastoma  recurrent  Re-hepatectomy  Percutaneous ablation  
点击此处可从《中华医学超声杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中华医学超声杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号