首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

新型寰枢椎后路动态固定系统的生物力学评价
引用本文:蒋伟宇,于亮,马维虎,赵刘军,徐荣明. 新型寰枢椎后路动态固定系统的生物力学评价[J]. 脊柱外科杂志, 2014, 12(3): 180-183
作者姓名:蒋伟宇  于亮  马维虎  赵刘军  徐荣明
作者单位:宁波市第六医院脊柱外科, 浙江, 315040;宁波市第六医院脊柱外科, 浙江, 315040;宁波市第六医院脊柱外科, 浙江, 315040;宁波市第六医院脊柱外科, 浙江, 315040;宁波市第六医院脊柱外科, 浙江, 315040
基金项目:浙江省医药卫生科技计划项目(2011RCB034);浙江省自然科学基金项目(LY02H06001)
摘    要:目的测试并评价新型寰枢椎后路动态固定系统的生物力学性能。方法新鲜成人枕颈标本(C0-4)8例,分成4组:完整状态组、寰枢椎不稳状态组、寰枢椎后路动态固定状态组和寰枢椎后路椎弓根螺钉固定状态组。通过加载1.50 N·m的力矩,对4组标本C1/C2、C2/C3节段的前屈/后伸,左/右侧弯和左/右旋转等6种运动方式下的运动范围(range of movement,ROM)及稳定性指数(stability index,SI)进行测试。结果采用新型寰枢椎后路动态固定系统后,C1/C2、C2/C3节段的ROM与正常完整标本相比较,差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);而采用常规椎弓根螺钉固定与动态固定法相比,C1/C2、C2/C3节段的ROM差异有统计学意义(P〈0.001)。采用寰枢椎后路动态固定系统固定与采用后路椎弓根螺钉固定,C1/C2SI均上升,与完整状态组相比差异均有统计学意义,分别为(P〈0.05)和(P〈0.001)。C2/C3测试结果显示,采用动态固定时SI分别上升为109%、107%和112%;而采用椎弓根螺钉固定,三维运动范围SI反而分别下降为77%、71%和87%,比动态固定SI分别低29%、34%和22%,差异具有统计学意义(P〈0.001)。结论新型寰枢椎后路动态固定系统既可维持寰枢椎的部分旋转功能,又可达到坚固固定的稳定性,同时能够有效地减少对邻近节段的影响,具有良好的研究前景。

关 键 词:寰椎  枢椎  内固定器  生物力学
收稿时间:2014-06-05

Biomechanical evaluation of new posterior atlanto-axial dynamic fixation system
JIANG Wei-yu,YU Liang,MA Wei-hu,ZHAO Liu-jun and XU Rong-ming. Biomechanical evaluation of new posterior atlanto-axial dynamic fixation system[J]. Journal of Spinal Surgery, 2014, 12(3): 180-183
Authors:JIANG Wei-yu  YU Liang  MA Wei-hu  ZHAO Liu-jun  XU Rong-ming
Affiliation:Department of Spinal Surgery, Ningbo No.6 Hospital, Ningbo 315040, Zhejiang, China;Department of Spinal Surgery, Ningbo No.6 Hospital, Ningbo 315040, Zhejiang, China;Department of Spinal Surgery, Ningbo No.6 Hospital, Ningbo 315040, Zhejiang, China;Department of Spinal Surgery, Ningbo No.6 Hospital, Ningbo 315040, Zhejiang, China;Department of Spinal Surgery, Ningbo No.6 Hospital, Ningbo 315040, Zhejiang, China
Abstract:Objective To evaluate biomechanics of a new posterior dynamic fixation system in atlanto-axial spine.Methods Eight fresh human cadaveric specimens (C0-4) were divided randomly into 4 groups: The intact state group, instable state group, posterior atlanto-axial dynamic fixation group and posterior atlanto-axial pedicle screw fixation group. Th range of movement (ROM) C1/C2 and C2/C3 by loading 1.50 N·m were measured under the 6 conditions of flexion/extension, left/right lateral bending and left/right rotation.Results Under the 6 conditions, there were no significant differences in ROM of C1/C2 and C2/C3 between dynamic fixation group and intact group (P>0.05), but there were significant differences in ROM of C1/C2 and C2/C3 between dynamic fixation group and pedicle fixation group (P<0.001). There were significant differences between intact group and dynamic fixation group, pedicle fixation group in stability index(SI) of C1/C2 under the conditions of flexion/extension, left/right lateral bending and left/right rotation, respectively (P<0.05) and (P<0.001). However, the SI of dynamic fixation group was superior to pedicle fixation group in C2/C3.Conclusion In vivo biomechanical studies show that the new posterior atlanto-axial dynamic fixation may ideally restored the stability of atlanto-axial, meanwhile, maintain the atlanto-axial ROM.
Keywords:Atlas  Axis  Internal fixators  Biomechanics
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《脊柱外科杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《脊柱外科杂志》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号