首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Brief report: assessing the impact of rating scale type, types of items, and age on the measurement of school-age children's self-reported quality of life
Authors:Cremeens Joanne  Eiser Christine  Blades Mark
Affiliation:Division of Behavioral Medicine, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 332 North Lauderdale, Mail Stop No. 740, Memphis, Tennessee 38105-2794, USA. joanne.cremeens@stjude.org
Abstract:OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of age, scale, and item type on the reliability and reproducibility of children's quality-of-life (QOL) responses. METHODS: The TedQL (ability, social, and mood items) was administered to 266 healthy children (age range of 5-6 and 7-9 years) at two time points, comparing three rating scales (circles, faces, and thermometer). Children were given the same (n = 144) or different (n = 122) scales over time. RESULTS: Reliability for total QOL and ability items was highest for circles and for social items using the faces. Faces and thermometer scales showed highest reproducibility over time. Greater agreement over time across different scales was found between circles and faces (5-6 years) and thermometer and circles (7-9 years). CONCLUSIONS: For maximum internal reliability, circles are recommended for ability items and faces for social items. For maximum reproducibility over time, the thermometer is recommended for 5-6 years and faces for 7-9 years.
Keywords:children   health-related quality of life   rating scales   self-report.
本文献已被 PubMed Oxford 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号