首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

食管癌超声内镜诊断探讨
引用本文:海伟丽,张连峰,陈香宇,郭长青. 食管癌超声内镜诊断探讨[J]. 河南肿瘤学杂志, 2009, 0(2): 151-152
作者姓名:海伟丽  张连峰  陈香宇  郭长青
作者单位:郑州大学第一附属医院消化科,河南郑州450052
摘    要:目的评估超声内镜(EUS)在食管癌的诊断及术前临床分期的价值。方法对经电子胃镜检查+活检诊断为食管癌的56例行EUS检查及TNM分期,与手术病理分期结果比较。结果食管癌术前EUS检查T、N分期的诊断准确率分别为T1期80.0%,T2期78.6%,T3期89.7%,T4期87.5%,T分期总准确率为85.7%;N0期74.1%,N1期79.3%,N分期总准确率为76.8%。结论EUS对食管癌的诊断及T、N分期诊断准确率较高,对指导术前制定治疗方案、评估预后有重要意义。

关 键 词:超声内镜  食管癌  诊断  术前分期

The Diagnostic Value of Endoscopic Uhrasonography in Esophageal Cancer
Hai Weili,Zhang Lianfeng,Chen Xiangyu,Guo Changqing. The Diagnostic Value of Endoscopic Uhrasonography in Esophageal Cancer[J]. Henan Journal of Oncology, 2009, 0(2): 151-152
Authors:Hai Weili  Zhang Lianfeng  Chen Xiangyu  Guo Changqing
Affiliation:(Department of Gastroenterology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China)
Abstract:Objective To evaluate'the diagnostic value of EUS in esophageal cancer and its application in preoperative clinical staging of esophageal cancer. Methods 56 patients with esophageal cancer were examined preoperatively by EUS, and staged according to the new TNM staging system(2003 ). The EUS findings were compared with surgical pathologic findings. Results The accuracy rates of T staging by EUS were 80. 0% forT1, 78.6% forT2, 89.7% forT3, 87.5% forT4, and 85.7% forT; those of N staging were 74:1% for N0,79.3% for N1 , and 76.8% for N. Conclusion The accuracy rates of EUS are higher for diagnosis in esophageal cancer and preoperative staging. There is great significance for choosing ideal therapy plan for esophageal cancer, and for estimating prognosis of esophageal cancer.
Keywords:endoscopic ultrasonography  esophageal cancer  diagnosis  preoperative clinical staging
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号