首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Effects of scopolamine,amphetamine and chlordiazepoxide on punishment
Authors:Dr Klaus A Miczek
Institution:(1) Department of Psychology, University of Chicago, 60637 Chicago, Illinois;(2) Department of Psychology, Carnegie-Mellon University, 15213 Schenley Park Pittsburgh, Pa., USA
Abstract:The hypothesis that behavioral suppression due to punishment requires the intact activity of an inhibitory cholinergic CNS mechanism is examined in three experiments in rats and squirrel monkeys. Scopolamine hydrobromide and scopolamine methyl nitrate decreased further operant lever pressing which was suppressed by intermittent or continuous punishment, but scopolamine hydrobromide had a dose-dependent slight facilitatory effect on punished dextrose solution intake in monkeys and non-reinforced operant lever pressing in rats. d-Amphetamine enhanced non-reinforced responding drastically, and had a dose-dependent biphasic effect on intermittently punished operant lever pressing in rats and punished consummatory behavior in monkeys. Chlordiazepoxide consistently enhanced behavior which was suppressed by various punishment procedures; however, response suppression due to non-reinforcement remained unaltered by chlordiazepoxide. It was concluded that only few drug effects on behavior which is suppressed by punishment or non-reinforcement can be accounted for by the drugs' disinhibitory action on a cholinergic CNS mechanism or by the response rate dependency principle.This research report is based on Chapter II of a dissertation submitted to the University of Chicago in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Ph. D. degree.
Keywords:Scopolamine Hydrobromide  d-Amphetamine  Chlordiazepoxide  Punishment  Passive Avoidance  Response Rate Dependency Principle  Inhibition  Rats  Squirrel Monkeys
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号