鼻腔鼻窦内翻性乳头状瘤与外周血炎症标志物的相关性研究

目的探讨鼻腔鼻窦内翻性乳头状瘤(SNIP)与外周血液炎症标志物的相关性。方法回顾分析2019年2月至2021年3月于河南省人民医院耳鼻咽喉科接受鼻窦内镜手术,经组织病理学诊断为鼻腔鼻窦内翻性乳头状瘤的62例患者作为实验组。选取同期62例健康体检者作为对照组。对两组的临床资料进行回顾性分析,对比分析两组术前外周血细胞成分计数及中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值(NLR),血小板/淋巴细胞比值(PLR)等之间的差异。将实验组根据是否复发、癌变进一步分为SNIP组(38例),复发组(14例)及癌变组(10例),分别进行多重比较分析。结果实验组与对照组的外周血中性粒细胞(P<0.001)、嗜酸性粒细胞计数(P<0.001),中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞计数比(NLR)(P=0.016),血小板/淋巴细胞计数比(PLR)(P=0.005)差异有统计学意义。建立Logistic回归分析模型发现,NLR的增加(P<0.001)、PLR的减少(P=0.002)以及嗜酸性粒细胞计数的增加(P=0.013)差异有统计学意义。实验组进一步多重比较分析,嗜碱性粒细胞计数在三组间总体差异有统计学意义,其中SNIP和复发组(P=0.045),癌变和复发组(P=0.017)在嗜碱性粒细胞计数比较差异有统计学意义。结论外周血嗜酸性粒细胞、中性粒细胞计数及NLR、PLR与SNIP具有相关性,并且可能成为SNIP的外周血液炎症标志物,NLR的增加、PLR的减少以及嗜酸性粒细胞计数的增加可能是SNIP的危险因素。

Correlation between sinonasal inverted papilloma and peripheral inflammatory blood markers

Objective To investigate the correlation between sinonasal inverted papilloma(SNIP)and peripheral inflammatory blood markers. Methods 62 patients with SNIP who received endoscopic sinus surgery in the Department of Otolaryngology of Henan People's Hospital from February 2019 to March 2021 were selected as the research objects. 62 age-and-sex-mached healthy controls were included in the study. The number of various peripheral blood cells and inflammatory blood markers such as neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio(NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio(PLR)of the patient and control groups were compared. According to whether with malignant transformation and recurrence patients, the research groups were further divided into the SNIP group(38 cases), the recurrence group(14 cases)and the cancer group(10 cases). Multiple comparative analysis were performed on the three sets of data. Results There were statistically significant differences between the patients and controls for neutrophil(P<0.001), eosinophil counts(P<0.001), NLR(P=0.016)and PLR(P=0.005). Logistic regression analysis model showed that the increase of NLR(P<0.001), decrease of PLR(P=0.002)and increase of eosinophil counts(P=0.013)were statistically significant. Further multiple comparative analysis showed that the basophil count in the experimental group was statistically different among the three groups. There was statistically significant difference in the basophil count between SNIP and recurrence group(P=0.045), canceration and recurrence group(P=0.017). Conclusion The peripheral blood eosinophil, neutrophil counts, NLR and PLR are correlated with SNIP, and can be used as peripheral blood inflammation markers of SNIP. The increase of NLR、eosinophil counts, and decrease of PLR may be the risk factors of SNIP.