首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

不同剖宫产术式对再次行剖宫产的影响分析
引用本文:刘敏.不同剖宫产术式对再次行剖宫产的影响分析[J].中国实用医药,2013,8(5):49-50.
作者姓名:刘敏
作者单位:山东省鄄城县古泉街道办事处卫生院妇产科,274600
摘    要:目的探讨不同剖宫产术式对再次行剖宫产的影响。方法 2008年1月至2012年5月采取再次行剖宫产孕产妇224例依据首次剖宫产方法分为传统子宫下段剖宫产组(腹壁纵切口)104例,新式剖宫产术组(腹壁横切口)120例进行观察。结果新式手术组在开腹时间,开腹出血量、术中总出血量,手术时间,术后排气时间,手术中腹腔粘连情况,住院时间上显著差于传统手术组,经统计学分析,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论新式剖宫产术具有手术时间短,局部损伤少,术中出血少,术后恢复快等优点而得到广泛应用。积极有效的降低剖宫产术率,对剖宫产术适应证严格掌握,合理选择手术方式,术中缝合腹膜,减少粘连,为下次剖宫产提供较为良好的腹腔条件。

关 键 词:不同剖宫产术式  再次行剖宫产  影响分析

Cesarean Section again cesarean section analysis
LIU Min.Cesarean Section again cesarean section analysis[J].China Practical Medical,2013,8(5):49-50.
Authors:LIU Min
Institution:LIU Min. Department of obstetricsand gynecology Guquan Neighborhood Offices Hospitals, Shandong 274600, China
Abstract:Objective To explore the different cesarean section cesarean section again. Methods 2008-01-2012-05 take a cesarean section maternal again based on 224 cases of primary cesarean section is divid- ed into traditional cesarean section group (abdominal longitudinal incision) 104 cases of cesarean section sur- gery group (transverse incision) 120 cases were observed. Results New surgical group in the open time, the amount of abdominal bleeding, the total amount of bleeding in surgery, operative time, postoperative exhaust time, peritoneal adhesions in surgery, hospital stay was significantly worse than traditional surgery group, there was significant difference (P 〈 0. 05). Conclusion cesarean section has shorter operative time, less local dam- age, less blood loss, rapid postoperative recovery, etc. widely used. Actively and effectively reduce the rate of cesarean section, cesarean section indications strictly controlled, reasonable choice of procedure, intraoperative suture peritoneal reduce adhesions, good for the next cesarean celiac condition.
Keywords:Different cesarean section  Cesarean section again  Impact analysis
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号