首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Recommendations for evaluation of neurogenic bladder and bowel dysfunction after spinal cord injury and/or disease
Authors:Denise G Tate  Tracey Wheeler  Giulia I Lane  Martin Forchheimer  Kim D Anderson  Fin Biering-Sorensen
Institution:1. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAdgtate@umich.eduORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5210-3704;3. Craig H Neilsen Foundation, Encino, California, USAORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6506-824X;4. Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6977-5280;5. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7709-9622;6. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Metro Health Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USAORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9252-161X;7. Clinic for Spinal Cord Injuries, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DenmarkORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2186-0144
Abstract:Objective: To provide an overview of clinical assessments and diagnostic tools, self-report measures (SRMs) and data sets used in neurogenic bladder and bowel (NBB) dysfunction and recommendations for their use with persons with spinal cord injury /disease (SCI/D).

Methods: Experts in SCI/D conducted literature reviews, compiled a list of NBB related assessments and measures, reviewed their psychometric properties, discussed their use in SCI/D and issued recommendations for the National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) Common Data Elements (CDEs) guidelines.

Results: Clinical assessments included 15 objective tests and diagnostic tools for neurogenic bladder and 12 for neurogenic bowel. Following a two-phase evaluation, eight SRMs were selected for final review with the Qualiveen and Short-Form (SF) Qualiveen and the Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction Score (NBDS) being recommended as supplemental, highly-recommended due to their strong psychometrics and extensive use in SCI/D. Two datasets and other SRM measures were recommended as supplemental.

Conclusion: There is no one single measure that can be used to assess NBB dysfunction across all clinical research studies. Clinical and diagnostic tools are here recommended based on specific medical needs of the person with SCI/D. Following the CDE for SCI studies guidelines, we recommend both the SF-Qualiveen for bladder and the NBDS for bowel as relatively short measures with strong psychometrics. Other measures are also recommended. A combination of assessment tools (objective and subjective) to be used jointly across the spectrum of care seems critical to best capture changes related to NBB and develop better treatments.
Keywords:Spinal cord injury  Spinal cord disease  Neurogenic bladder  Neurogenic bowel  Clinical assessments  Self- report measures  Data sets
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号