Is There Space for Surgery in the Treatment of Tachyarrhythmias? |
| |
Authors: | RICHARD N.W. HAUER M.D. |
| |
Affiliation: | From the Department of Cardiology, Heart-Lung Institute, University Hospital Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands |
| |
Abstract: | Curative treatment of both supraventricular and ventricular tachyarrhythmias started with the introduction of surgical therapy. Surgical treatment modalities were often very successful and associated with low mortality and morbidity, especially in patients with various supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. However, results were acceptable in patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias, with often a very complex and extended arrhythmogenic area associated with structural heart disease. Because of the development and proven effectiveness of catheter ablation and defibrillator implantation, the role of surgical therapy became limited. In the treatment of supraventricular arrhythmias, surgical therapy is an option after failure of catheter ablation. Since His-bundle catheter ablation is only a palliative treatment for atrial fibrillation, the potentially curative Maze operation may be an acceptable alternative. However, its potential against formation of intracavitary thrombi has not yet been proven. In the treatment of ventricular tachyarrhythmias, ischemia related polymorphic ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation can be treated very effectively by revascularization. Map-guided surgery is an appropriate treatment modality for patients with monomorphic ventricular tachycardia and an extended arrhythmogenic area. However, patients with very poor left ventricular function may have an unacceptable perioperative risk. In patients with congenital long QT syndrome who are refractory to beta blocking agents, left-sided sympathectomy is the most appropriate choice. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|