首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

两种不同原理空气消毒器消毒效果的试验研究
引用本文:孙俊,陈越英,徐燕,谈智,陈文宇,戎毅. 两种不同原理空气消毒器消毒效果的试验研究[J]. 中国消毒学杂志, 2006, 23(3): 197-199
作者姓名:孙俊  陈越英  徐燕  谈智  陈文宇  戎毅
作者单位:1. 江苏省疾病预防控制中心,南京,210009
2. 常州市疾病预防控制中心
摘    要:为观察两种不同原理空气消毒器的消毒效果,采用空气消毒试验方法进行了实验室和现场试验研究。结果,紫外线循环风空气消毒器和静电吸附式空气消毒器开机作用60m in,对20m3气雾室空气中白色葡萄球菌的杀灭率分别为99.98%和99.96%。在现场53m3房间内两种消毒器开机作用90m in,对室内空气中自然菌的消除率分别为93.37%和94.65%。结论,两种空气消毒器在实验室和现场的室内空气消毒效果均达到规定的消毒标准。

关 键 词:空气消毒器  消毒效果  白色葡萄球菌  自然菌
文章编号:1001-7658(2006)05-0197-03
收稿时间:2005-11-25
修稿时间:2005-11-25

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON DISINFECTION EFFICACY OF TWO AIR DISINFECTORS BASED ON DIFFERENT PRINCIPLES
SUN Jun,CHEN Yue-ying,XU Yan,TAN Zhi,CHEN Wen-yu,RONG Yi. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON DISINFECTION EFFICACY OF TWO AIR DISINFECTORS BASED ON DIFFERENT PRINCIPLES[J]. Chinese Journal of Disinfection, 2006, 23(3): 197-199
Authors:SUN Jun  CHEN Yue-ying  XU Yan  TAN Zhi  CHEN Wen-yu  RONG Yi
Affiliation:Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Nanjiang 210009 ; 1. Changzhou Municipal Center for Dis- ease Prevention and Control, China
Abstract:In order to observe the disinfection efficacy of two air disinfectors based on different principles,air disinfection test method was used to carry out laboratory and field experimental studies.Results: Operation of ultraviolet circulating-wind air disinfector and electrostatic adsorption-type air disinfector for 60 min killed 99.98% and 99.96% of Staphylococcus albus in air of 20 m~3 aerosol chamber respectively.In field trial,operation of the two disinfectors for 90 min in a 53 m~3 room eliminated 93.37% and 94.65% of natural bacteria in air of the room respectively.Conclusion: The efficacy of both of the two disinfectors in disinfection of indoor air in laboratory and field tests attained the specified disinfection standard.
Keywords:air disinfector    disinfection efficacy    Staphylococcus albus    natural bacteria
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号