Distress screening in oncology—evaluation of the Questionnaire on Distress in Cancer Patients—short form (QSC‐R10) in a German sample |
| |
Authors: | Katrin Book Birgitt Marten‐Mittag Gerhard Henrich Andreas Dinkel Patrick Scheddel Susanne Sehlen Wolfgang Haimerl Thomas Schulte Ingrid Britzelmeir Peter Herschbach |
| |
Institution: | 1. Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universit?t München, Munich, Germany;2. Department of Clinical Psychology, Justus‐Liebig‐Universit?t Gie?en, Gie?en, Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, Offenbach am Main, Germany;3. Department of Radiooncology, Campus Gro?hadern, Klinikum der Ludwig‐Maximilians Universit?t, Munich, Germany;4. Department of Radiooncology, Campus Innenstadt, Klinikum der Ludwig‐Maximilians Universit?t, Munich, Germany;5. Klinik für onkologische Rehabilitation und Anschlussheilbehandlung, Klinik Bad Oexen, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany;6. Institut für Psychoonkologie, Klinikum Lippe, Lemgo, Germany |
| |
Abstract: | Objective: The aim was to examine the psychometric properties of the Questionnaire on Stress in Cancer Patients (QSC‐R10), a 10‐item screening instrument for self‐assessment of psychosocial distress in cancer patients. Methods: A total of 1850 cancer patients were assessed with the QSC‐R10. Patients were recruited from different inpatient and outpatient settings in Germany between 2007 and 2009. Results: Mean age of the sample was 62.9 (SD=12.4) with breast cancer as the most frequent diagnosis (35.2%). The analysis indicated high reliability (Cronbach's α=0.85) and test–retest reliability (ICC=0.89). Validation scales included the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Distress–Thermometer (DT), European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ‐C30 (EORTC QLQ‐C30) and Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS). Convergent validity was highest for the HADS total score (r=0.74) and the lowest correlation for KPS (r=?0.36). The QSC‐R10 significantly distinguished subgroups by their clinical characteristics (metastases, illness duration, previous psychiatric treatment and psycho‐oncological support; p<0.001). A cutoff score of >14 demonstrated good sensitivity (81.0%) and specificity (73.2%) and is suitable to determine the need for psychosocial support. Conclusion: The QSC‐R10 is a valid and reliable questionnaire to detect distress in cancer patients with high acceptance among professionals and patients. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
| |
Keywords: | cancer oncology psycho‐oncology psychosocial distress distress screening |
|
|