首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


The Pulmonary Rehabilitation Adapted Index of Self-Efficacy (PRAISE) tool predicts reduction in sedentary time following pulmonary rehabilitation in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
Authors:Athina Liacos  Christine F McDonald  Ajay Mahal  Catherine J Hill  Annemarie L Lee  Angela T Burge  Rosemary Moore  Caroline Nicolson  Paul O’Halloran  Narelle S Cox  Aroub Lahham  Rebecca Gillies  Anne E Holland
Institution:1. Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia;2. Institute for Breathing and Sleep, Melbourne, Australia;3. La Trobe University, 99 Commercial Rd, Melbourne, Australia;4. The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia;5. Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia
Abstract:

Objectives

To examine the predictive validity, minimal important difference (MID) and responsiveness of the PRAISE tool.

Design

Retrospective data analysis from HomeBase trial of home vs centre-based pulmonary rehabilitation.

Setting

Tertiary health service.

Participants

One hundred and sixty-six participants with COPD (100 men) with mean age 69 (SD 9) years, FEV1% predicted 50% (19).

Interventions

Eight-week pulmonary rehabilitation program, conducted at the hospital or at home.

Main outcome measures

The 15-item PRAISE tool comprising 10 general and five pulmonary rehabilitation-specific self-efficacy questions. Predictive validity was examined by exploring the relationship between baseline PRAISE score and objective change in physical activity following pulmonary rehabilitation using the SenseWear Armband. The MID was evaluated using anchor-based and distribution-based methods. Responsiveness was assessed with effect sizes.

Results

A higher baseline PRAISE score (indicating better self-efficacy) was an independent predictor of reduced sedentary time following pulmonary rehabilitation (P = 0.03). A one point increase in PRAISE was associated with a decrease in sedentary time of 4 minutes/day (95% confidence interval ?7.8 to ?0.4 minutes/day). Anchor-based estimates of the MID were 0.5 to 1.5 points; however sensitivity and specificity were modest (area under the curve <0.70). Change in PRAISE score following pulmonary rehabilitation had an effect size of 0.21.

Conclusions

The PRAISE tool has predictive validity and may be useful to identify those with high self-efficacy who are more likely to achieve important health behaviour changes with pulmonary rehabilitation. The small effect size suggests that the PRAISE tool was not responsive to changes following pulmonary rehabilitation.

Trial registration number

NCT01423227, clinicaltrials.gov.
Keywords:Physical activity  Pulmonary disease  chronic obstructive  Self-efficacy  Health behaviour
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号