三种不同经外周置入中心静脉导管固定方法临床效果的比较

目的 比较3种不同的经外周静脉置人中心静脉导管(PICC)固定方法对导管固定的临床效果.方法 将120例留置PICC导管患者采用便利抽样的方法分为3组,每组各40例,分别采用缝合固定(A组)、免缝胶带交叉固定(B组)和思乐扣免缝导管固定装置固定(C组).观察并比较3组患者置管后留置期间导管固定的牢固性、并发症发生率、固定部位皮肤损伤情况及患者的满意度.结果 B组导管移位的发生率(57.5%)明显高于A组(12.5%,P=0.000)和C组(7.5%,P=0.000),导管脱出的发生率(15.0%)亦明显高于A组(0,P=0.034)和C组(0,P=0.034).导管留置期间静脉炎的发生率在B组(25.0%)明显高于A组(7.5%,P=0.034)和C组(5.0%,P=0.012);在A组中并发穿刺部位蜂窝织炎的发生率明显高于C组(20.0%比2.5%,P=0.034).A组患者出现固定翼下的皮肤压痕的发生率(37.5%)明显高于B组(5.0%,P=0.000)和C组(5.O%,P=0.000),且A组患者皮肤破损的发生率(22.5%)也高于B组(5.0%,P=0.023)和C组(0,P=0.005);各种原因所致的皮肤刺激痛在A组(52.5%)中明显增加,高于B组(0,P=0.000)和C组(2.5%,P=0.000).患者对3组不同导管固定法的满意度在A组(12.0%)显著低于B组(62.5%,P=0.000)和C组(90.0%,P=0.000),且C组满意度最高,明显高于B组(P=0.004).结论 思乐扣免缝导管固定装置固定法可以作为胶带和缝合固定的替代,具有等同于缝合法对导管的固定作用,预防了导管移位、脱出等导管相关并发症,同时也避免了缝合固定造成的皮肤损伤.

Abstract：

Objecfive To compare the clinical effectiveness of three different fixation methods for peripherally inserted central catheter(PICC).Methods Totally 120 patients requiting PICCs were randomized into suture securement group(group A),tape securement group(group B),and sutureless adhesive-hacked device (StatIock)securement group(group C),with 40 patients in each group.Patients were followed up throughout their entire catheter course,and the securement effectiveness,catheter-related complications,risk of skin injury,and patients'satisfaction were observed.Results The rate of catheter migration without function loss in group B (57.5%)was significantly higherthan in group A(12.5%,P=0.000)and in group C(7.5%,P=0.000).Catheter dislodgment rate in group B(15.0%)was also significantly higher than group A(0,P=0.034)and group C(0,JP=0.034).Phlebitis documented during their catheter course in group B(25.0%)were more than in group A(7.5%,P=0.034)and in group C(5.0%,P=0.012).In addition,the rate of cellulitis in group A was significantly higher than group C(20.0%vs.2.5%,P=0.034).The rate of skin injury in group A 0.005).Nearly half of patients in group A (52.5%)complained irritation and/or pain at the sucure site,which was significantly higher than in other two groups ( both P = 0.000 ).The patients' satisfaction rate was significantly lower in group A (12.0% ) than in the other two groups ( both P = 0.000), documented highest in group C (90.0%) (group C vs.group B, P = 0.004).Conclusions The availability of sutureless adhesive-backed de vice StatLock provides an alternative for securement of PICCs.It performs as well as suture securement in catheterfixing.Meanwhile, it can prevent catheter-related complications such as migration and dislodgment Furthermore, it avoids skin injuries during catheter fixation or securement.

Comparison of three different fixiation methods for peripherally inserted central catheter

Objecfive To compare the clinical effectiveness of three different fixation methods for peripherally inserted central catheter(PICC).Methods Totally 120 patients requiting PICCs were randomized into suture securement group(group A),tape securement group(group B),and sutureless adhesive-hacked device (StatIock)securement group(group C),with 40 patients in each group.Patients were followed up throughout their entire catheter course,and the securement effectiveness,catheter-related complications,risk of skin injury,and patients'satisfaction were observed.Results The rate of catheter migration without function loss in group B (57.5%)was significantly higherthan in group A(12.5%,P=0.000)and in group C(7.5%,P=0.000).Catheter dislodgment rate in group B(15.0%)was also significantly higher than group A(0,P=0.034)and group C(0,JP=0.034).Phlebitis documented during their catheter course in group B(25.0%)were more than in group A(7.5%,P=0.034)and in group C(5.0%,P=0.012).In addition,the rate of cellulitis in group A was significantly higher than group C(20.0%vs.2.5%,P=0.034).The rate of skin injury in group A 0.005).Nearly half of patients in group A (52.5%)complained irritation and/or pain at the sucure site,which was significantly higher than in other two groups ( both P = 0.000 ).The patients' satisfaction rate was significantly lower in group A (12.0% ) than in the other two groups ( both P = 0.000), documented highest in group C (90.0%) (group C vs.group B, P = 0.004).Conclusions The availability of sutureless adhesive-backed de vice StatLock provides an alternative for securement of PICCs.It performs as well as suture securement in catheterfixing.Meanwhile, it can prevent catheter-related complications such as migration and dislodgment Furthermore, it avoids skin injuries during catheter fixation or securement.