Egg sharing and egg donation: attitudes of British egg donors and recipients |
| |
Authors: | Ahuja KK; Mostyn BJ; Simons EG |
| |
Institution: | Cromwell IVF and Fertility Centre, Cromwell Hospital, London, UK. |
| |
Abstract: | The question of payment to egg donors has recently focused the attention of
both the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) and licensed
clinics. An acute shortage of egg donors and the rising costs of assisted
conception treatment are matters of grave concern to many patients. To
understand the emotional and social effects of egg sharing and egg
donation, we conducted a survey of attitudes in a group of women who had
some knowledge or experience of egg donation. A total of 750 questionnaires
were sent out of which 217 were returned within the specified time limit.
From these, 107 respondents had experience of egg donation and 110 had made
enquiries about donation. The data from these questionnaires were collated
and tabulated by the National Opinion Polls (NOP) Research Group. An
analysis of the data produced the following key findings: (i) donating or
sharing eggs is a social issue, 94% discuss it with
partners/family/friends; (ii) altruistic motives are not the prerogative of
non-patient volunteers-egg share donors felt that helping the childless was
as important as having a chance of in-vitro fertilization (IVF) for
themselves; (iii) the treatment procedure causes the most anxiety for egg
donors. The recipients were most concerned about delays, donor
characteristics and how the eggs were allocated; (iv) most respondents
(65%) with prior experience of egg sharing would do it again - 63% of egg
share donors, 72% of egg share recipients; (v) cash rewards to egg donors
and outright advertising for donors were rejected by 64 and 62% of the
sample respectively; and (vi) counselling was highly valued and there were
no instances of 'shattered lives' after treatment. The findings do not
support the recently announced intentions of the HFEA to disallow payment
to gamete donors on the grounds of devalued consent. There is no precedent
in modern medicine for egg sharing. The patients surveyed drew a clear
distinction between egg sharing and financial rewards. As long as egg
donation is not covered by the National Health Service, it is fairer to
offer egg sharing than to refuse treatment to those unable to pay.
|
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 Oxford 等数据库收录! |
|