首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

成年大鼠骨髓基质干细胞诱导分化为神经元样细胞不同方法比较的研究
引用本文:叶民,陈生弟,陆国强,梁梁,刘卫国.成年大鼠骨髓基质干细胞诱导分化为神经元样细胞不同方法比较的研究[J].中国神经科学杂志,2004,20(4):275-280.
作者姓名:叶民  陈生弟  陆国强  梁梁  刘卫国
作者单位:上海第二医科大学附属瑞金医院神经科,帕金森病诊疗与研究中心,上海200025
基金项目:国家重点基础研究规划“脑功能和脑重大疾病的基础研究”(G1999054008),国家自然科学基金(39970263,30171025),上海市卫生系统百名跨世纪优秀学科带头人培养计划(97BR001)
摘    要:目的 研究成年大鼠骨髓基质干细胞(BMSCs)诱导分化为神经元样细胞不同的方法,寻找它向神经细胞分化的最佳条件。方法 取纯度较高的BMSCs,通过不同的神经营养因子诱导法和抗氧化剂诱导法,进行抗巢蛋白(nestin)、神经元特异烯醇化酶(NSE)、神经胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)、酪氨酸羟化酶(TH)免疫细胞化学染色,观察相应的阳性细胞数。结果 诱导第3天A组(EGF:表皮生长因子,bFGF:碱性成纤维细胞生长因子,RA:全反式维甲酸),B组(GDNF:胶质细胞系源性神经营养因子,BDNF:脑源性神经营养因子),C组(EGF,bFGF,GDNF,BDNF和RA)的Nestin阳性细胞数较多,其中以C组最多,而D组(抗氧化剂)Nestin阳性细胞数少于前三组。A,B,C组的NSE,GFAP染色阳性细胞数较D组少,但D组有部分细胞发生死亡。诱导第7天A,B,C组的NSE,GFAP阳性细胞数较第3天时明显增多,C组最多,B组其次,Nestin阳性细胞数比例较第3天时明显减少。而D组的NSE,GFAP阳性细胞数少于其第3天时;C组诱导成神经细胞比例较高,阴性对照组和空白对照组极少或无阳性细胞。此外,神经营养因子诱导法生成神经样细胞的比例都多于胶质样细胞。结论 抗氧化剂诱导法分化诱导快,而神经营养因子诱导法分化诱导效率高,诱导后细胞生长状态明显好于前者,各种神经营养因子联合作用影响BMSCs的增殖和分化。

关 键 词:骨髓基质干细胞  诱导分化  神经元  神经营养因子  抗氧化剂

Comparative study of inducing differentiation of adult rat bone marrow stromal cells into neurons by various neurotrophic factors and antioxidant
YE Ming,CHEN Sheng-di,LU Guo-qiang,LIANG Liang,LIU Wei-guo.Comparative study of inducing differentiation of adult rat bone marrow stromal cells into neurons by various neurotrophic factors and antioxidant[J].Neuroscience Bulletin,2004,20(4):275-280.
Authors:YE Ming  CHEN Sheng-di  LU Guo-qiang  LIANG Liang  LIU Wei-guo
Abstract:Objective To investigate the conditions of inducing adult rat bone marrow stroma cells (BMSCs) differentiation into neurons in order to find the best way. Methods High purified BMSCs were selected and induced into neurons through the methods of various neurotrophic factors and antioxidant. The number of different immunoreactive cells was detected by nestin, NSE, GFAP and tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) immunocytochemistry. Results At the third day after the induction, more nestin positive cells were found in group A (EGF, bFGF and RA), B (GDNF and BDNF) and C (EGF, bFGF, GDNF, BDNF and RA), which was the most in group C, while less in group D (antioxidant). NSE and GFAP positive cells were more in group D than those in group A ,B and C, but the cell death was detected in group D. In group A, B and C, the number of NSE and GFAP-positive cells was much more at the 7th day than that at the 3rd day after induction. The number of nestin-positive cells was significantly decreased at the 7th day than that at the 3rd day after induction. In group D the number of NSE and GFAP-positive cells was less at the 7th day than that at the 3rd day after induction. The number of neurons induced was the most in group C. There were few or no positive cells in negative control and no induction groups. The proportion of neurons was higher than that of glial cells in all groups of neurotrophic factor induction. Conclusion The antioxidant can rapidly induce BMSCs into neurons, whereas neurotrophic factors can induce BMSCs into neurons with higher efficiency and good cell behavior. The various neurotrophic factors may take synergic actions in proliferation and differentiation of BMSCs.
Keywords:bone marrow stroma cells  induction  differentiation  neuron  neurotrophic factor  antioxidant
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号