首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

替尼泊甙与依托泊甙治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的对比研究
引用本文:季有信,朱军.替尼泊甙与依托泊甙治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的对比研究[J].中国癌症杂志,1997,7(1):25-26.
作者姓名:季有信  朱军
作者单位:青岛市肿瘤医院内科
摘    要:目的比较替尼泊甙(VM-16)与依托泊甙(VP-16)对晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效。方法晚期非小细胞肺癌61例,随机分为A、B两组,A组应用顺铂(DDP)+VP-16方案化疗,B组应用DDP+VM-26方案化疗,2~3周期化疗后评价疗效和不良作用。结果A组有效率为37.5%(12/32),B组有效率为33.3%(7/21),两组无显著差异。A组与B组Ⅲ~Ⅳ级骨髓毒性发生率分别为28.1%和23.8%,Ⅱ~Ⅲ级胃肠道毒性发生率分别为31.3%和23.8%。结论VM-26治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的有效率与VP-16相似,而不良反应发生率低。

关 键 词:癌.非小细胞肺  替尼泊甙  依托泊甙  顺铂  药物疗法

CONTROLLED STUDY TENIPOSIDE AND ETOPOSIDE FOR ADVANCED NSCLC
Ji Youxin,Zhu Jun,Xu Mei,et al.CONTROLLED STUDY TENIPOSIDE AND ETOPOSIDE FOR ADVANCED NSCLC[J].China Oncology,1997,7(1):25-26.
Authors:Ji Youxin  Zhu Jun  Xu Mei  
Abstract:PURPOSE To compare the anticancer results of VM 26 with VP 16 in advanced non small cell lung cancer. METHODS 61 histologically confirmed NSCLC patients were randomized into two groups after hospitalization. One group was treated wth DDP VP 16,the other with DDP VM 26, 21 days per cycle. Patients who completed at least 2 cycles were evaluated. RESULTS 53 patients were evaluated. The response rates for VP 16 and VM 26 groups 37 5% (12/32) and 33 3% (7/21) respectively. There was no significant difference ( P >0 05).The side effects of the two groups were mainly hematologic and gastrointestinal toxicities. CONCLUSIONS VM 26 is an effective agent for NSCLC,and its toxicities are moderate.
Keywords:carcinoma  non  small  cell lung  tenoposide  etoposide  cisplatin  drug therapy  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号