Novel applications of external anal sphincter muscle sarcomere length to enhance the anal canal function |
| |
Authors: | M. R. Rajasekaran Y. Jiang V. Bhargava R. L. Lieber R. K. Mittal |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA;2. Department of Orthopedics, University of California, San Diego VA Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA |
| |
Abstract: | Background Our recent studies show that the external anal sphincter muscle (EAS) operates at a sarcomere length range which is below optimal. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that by surgically increasing sarcomere length and bringing it close to the optimal length, EAS muscle function and anal canal pressure can be enhanced. Methods Rabbits (n = 25) were anesthetized and subjected to either a sham or an EAS plication of different length by placing sutures at two locations, at a distance of 13%, 20%, 28%, or 35% of the circumferential length of the anal canal. Anal canal pressures were recorded before and after the plication. Anal canal was harvested and the EAS muscle sarcomere length was measured using laser diffraction. Key Results Electrical stimulation of the EAS muscle resulted in a stimulus‐dependent increase in the anal canal pressure (mmHg) and EAS muscle stress (mN mm?2). A significant increase in maximal pressure (212 ± 13 after compared with 139 ± 22 before plication) as well as stress (166 ± 10 after as compared with 88 ± 14 before plication) was recorded at 20% plication length. Passive anal canal stress at 20% plication was not significantly different compared with the sham group. The mean sarcomere lengths with sham and 20% plication were 2.11 and 2.60 μm, respectively. Conclusions & Inferences EAS plication resulted in a length‐dependent increase in EAS muscle sarcomere length with an optimal sarcomere length at 20% plication. These considerations may help guide repair of anal sphincter muscle defects in the humans. |
| |
Keywords: | anal continence anal sphincter injury length– tension plication |
|
|