| 尿白细胞、红细胞干化学法检测与人工显微镜检查的比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 唐健辰,戴芬.尿白细胞、红细胞干化学法检测与人工显微镜检查的比较[J].上海医学检验杂志,2010(3). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 唐健辰 戴芬 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 上海市金山区金山卫镇社区卫生服务中心; |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的通过尿液干化学法检测白细胞(WBC)、红细胞(RBC),与人工显微镜检查作比较,对干化学法产生假阳性及假阴性结果原因进行探讨。方法随机收集本院门诊患者新鲜尿液标本500份,分别采用干化学法检测及人工显微镜检查其尿液中WBC、RBC。结果以人工显微镜检查为对照,干化学法WBC检测结果的阳性符合率为84.23%,阴性符合率为95.68%,假阳性率为4.31%,假阴性率为15.77%;RBC检测结果的阳性符合率为93.7%,阴性符合率为86.27%,假阳性率为13.72%,假阴性率为6.29%。结论干化学法检测尿液WBC、RBC快速简便,适用于检测尿液WBC、RBC的过筛,但此法假阳性与假阴性较高,不能完全取代人工显微镜检查。
|
| 关 键 词： | 干化学法 显微镜 过筛 白细胞 红细胞 尿液 |
The comparison of urine white blood cell and red blood cell detection by dry chemistry method and microscope method |
| |
| TANG Jianchen,DAI Fen..The comparison of urine white blood cell and red blood cell detection by dry chemistry method and microscope method[J].Shanghai Journal of Medical Laboratory Sciences,2010(3). |
| |
| Authors: | TANG Jianchen DAI Fen |
| |
| Institution: | TANG Jianchen,DAI Fen.(Shanghai Jinshan Weizhen Community Health Service Center,Shanghai 201512,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Objective To compare the results of urine white blood cell(WBC) and red blood cell(RBC) detection by dry chemistry method and microscope method,and discuss the false positive or false negative results of dry chemistry method.Methods 500 fresh urine samples from outpatients were collected randomly and analyzed by means of dry chemistry method and microscope method.The WBC and RBC were determined.Results In comparison with the microscope method,the dry chemistry detection of WBC had the results of positive co... |
| |
| Keywords: | Dry chemistry method Microscope Screening White blood cell Red blood cell Urine |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
|
