A reliable method for monitoring intraabdominal pressure during natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery |
| |
Authors: | M. F. McGee M. J. Rosen J. Marks A. Chak R. Onders A. Faulx A. Ignagni S. Schomisch J. Ponsky |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Department of Surgery, Case Western Reserve University, Case Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA;(2) Department of Gastroenterology, Case Western Reserve University, Case Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA;(3) Case Advanced Surgical Endoscopy Team (CASE-T), Case Western Reserve University, Case Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA |
| |
Abstract: | Background Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) provides surgical access to the peritoneal cavity without skin incisions. The NOTES procedure requires pneumoperitoneum for visualization and manipulation of abdominal organs, similar to laparoscopy. Accurate measurement of the pneumoperitoneum pressure is essential to avoid potentially deleterious effects of intraabdominal compartment syndrome. A reliable method for monitoring pneumoperitoneum pressures during NOTES has not been identified. This study evaluated several methods of monitoring intraabdominal pressures with a standard gastroscope during NOTES. Methods Four female pigs (25 kg) were sedated, and a single-channel gastroscope was passed transgastrically into the peritoneal cavity. Pneumoperitoneum was achieved via a pressure insufflator through a percutaneous, intraperitoneal 14-gauge catheter. Three other pressures were recorded via separate catheters. First, a 14-gauge percutaneous catheter passed intraperitoneally measured true intraabdominal pressure. Second, a 14-gauge tube attached to the endoscope was used to measure endoscope tip pressure. The third pressure transducer was connected directly to the accessory channel of the endoscope. The abdomen was insufflated to a range of pressures (10–30 mmHg), and simultaneous pressures were recorded from all three pressure sensors. Results Pressure correlation curves were developed for all animals across all intraperitoneal pressures (mean error, –4.25 to –1 mmHg). Endoscope tip pressures correlated with biopsy channel pressures (R 2 = 0.99). Biopsy channel and endoscope tip pressures fit a least-squares linear model to predict actual intraabdominal pressure (R = 0.99 for both). Both scope tip and biopsy channel port pressures were strongly correlative with true intraabdominal pressures (R 2 = 0.98 and R 2 = 0.99, respectively). Conclusion This study demonstrates that monitoring pressure through an endoscope is reliable and predictive of true intraabdominal pressure. Gastroscope pressure monitoring is a useful adjunct to NOTES. Future NOTES procedures should incorporate continuous intraabdominal pressure monitoring to avoid the potentially deleterious effects of pneumoperitoneum during NOTES. This can be achieved by the integration of pressure-monitoring capabilities into gastroscopes. Presented at the 2006 Scientific Session of Society of American Gastrointestional and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES), April 2006, Dallas, TX, USA |
| |
Keywords: | Abdominal Endoscopy G-I Pneumoperitoneum Therapeutic/Palliation |
本文献已被 PubMed SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|