| Abstract: | Early endoscopic diagnosis of colorectal cancers (CRCs) represents the best tool for the reduction of CRC mortality, but the conventional colonoscopic view seems unable to clarify faint changes of colorectal mucosa. For these reasons, during the last few decades, two new techniques have been developed in order to better define, diagnose and treat colorectal lesions: chromoendoscopy (CE) and magnifying chromoendoscopy (MC). The authors herein highlight the benefits of both and compare the results of conventional endoscopy and CE with 0.2% indigo carmine solution, evaluating 995 consecutive selected patients referred for colonoscopy between January 1999 and March 2003 at the International Health Union of Rome. CE showed new neoplastic patterns not detectable with conventional endoscopy in 102 patients (10.2%). The incidence of high-grade dysplasia and early carcinomas was 9.9% for protruded, 13.1% for flat and 60% for depressed lesions. Our comparative study on 995 consecutive selected patients confirmed the existence of flat and depressed neoplasms in Italy and shows the high accuracy rate of CE over conventional endoscopy for the detection of non-polypoid lesions. CE should be used routinely in order to enhance the early diagnosis of CRCs, while MC in experienced hands represents a significant advance in colonoscopic practice improving the diagnosis of every single lesion, enhancing therapeutic efficacy of colorectal tumours. |
