The opening interrupter technique for respiratory resistance measurements in children

Background and objective: The interrupter resistance (Rint) can be calculated from various estimates of alveolar pressure based on mouth pressure during occlusion. We compared Rint, as measured by the opening interrupter technique (Rint1), and the linear back‐extrapolation method (Rint2), with the ‘gold standard’ airway resistance measured by plethysmography (Raw). Methods: The study included 32 asthmatic children and 11 children with cystic fibrosis, aged 5 to 18 years, who were categorized into non‐obstructed (NObs) (n = 27) and obstructed (Obs) (n = 16) groups. Spirometry and the three different resistance measurements were performed on all children. Rint1 and Raw were assessed after a bronchodilator (BD) test in 16 and nine children, respectively, in the Obs group. Results: Raw (0.48 ± 0.20 kPa.s/L) was lower than Rint1 (1.04 ± 0.34 kPa.s/L) and Rint2 (0.63 ± 0.18 kPa.s/L) (P < 0.001). Raw, but neither Rint1 nor Rint2, was significantly higher in the Obs group than in the NObs group (0.57 ± 0.23 vs 0.42 ± 0.16 kPa.s/L, P < 0.05). The differences Rint1‐Raw and Rint2‐Raw were correlated with FEV₁/VC (P < 0.01 and P < 0.001), and Rint1‐Raw was correlated with height (P < 0.001). After BD significant changes in Rint1 and Raw were observed in 5/9 and 7/9 children, respectively. Conclusions: Rint2, as well as Rint1, may be underestimated in the most Obs children and may therefore fail to detect severe obstruction. Rint1 is likely to include a non‐negligible contribution from the tissue component, especially in the youngest children. Although not different between Obs and NObs children at baseline, Rint1 did detect bronchodilation in some Obs children.