首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Standardizing terminology for minimally invasive pancreatic resection
Authors:Andre L. Montagnini  Bård I. Røsok  Horacio J. Asbun  Jeffrey Barkun  Marc G. Besselink  Ugo Boggi  Kevin C.P. Conlon  Abe Fingerhut  Ho-Seong Han  Paul D. Hansen  Melissa E. Hogg  Michael L. Kendrick  Chinnusamy Palanivelu  Shailesh V. Shrikhande  Go Wakabayashi  Herbert Zeh  Charles M. Vollmer  David A. Kooby
Affiliation:1. Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil;2. University of Oslo University, Oslo, Norway;3. Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA;4. McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada;5. Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;6. University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy;7. The University of Dublin, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland;8. University Hospital of Graz, Graz, Austria;9. Seoul National University, SeongNam si, Korea;10. Portland Providence Cancer Center, Portland, OR, USA;11. University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA;12. The Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA;13. GEM Hospital & Research Center, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India;14. Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India;15. Ageo Central General Hospital, Saitama, Japan;16. The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA;17. Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
Abstract:

Background

There is a growing body of literature pertaining to minimally invasive pancreatic resection (MIPR). Heterogeneity in MIPR terminology, leads to confusion and inconsistency. The Organizing Committee of the State of the Art Conference on MIPR collaborated to standardize MIPR terminology.

Methods

After formal literature review for “minimally invasive pancreatic surgery” term, key terminology elements were identified. A questionnaire was created assessing the type of resection, the approach, completion, and conversion. Delphi process was used to identify the level of agreement among the experts.

Results

A systematic terminology template was developed based on combining the approach and resection taking into account the completion. For a solitary approach the term should combine “approach + resection” (e.g. “laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy); for combined approaches the term must combine “first approach + resection” with “second approach + reconstruction” (e.g. “laparoscopic central pancreatectomy” with “open pancreaticojejunostomy”) and where conversion has resulted the recommended term is “first approach” + “converted to” + “second approach” + “resection” (e.g. “robot-assisted” “converted to open” “pancreatoduodenectomy”)

Conclusions

The guidelines presented are geared towards standardizing terminology for MIPR, establishing a basis for comparative analyses and registries and allow incorporating future surgical and technological advances in MIPR.
Keywords:Correspondence: Andre L. Montagnini   Hospital das Clinicas da Universidade de Sao Paulo   Disciplina de Cirurgia do Aparelho Digestivo   Rua Mario Amaral   267   Sao Paulo   SP   04002-021   Brazil.
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号