Optimizing left‐sided live kidney donation: hand‐assisted retroperitoneoscopic as alternative to standard laparoscopic donor nephrectomy

Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) is less traumatic and painful than the open approach, with shorter convalescence time. Hand‐assisted retroperitoneoscopic (HARP) donor nephrectomy may have benefits, particularly in left‐sided nephrectomy, including shorter operation and warm‐ischemia time (WIT) and improved safety. We evaluated outcomes of HARP alongside LDN. From July 2006 to May 2008, 20 left‐sided HARP procedures and 40 left‐sided LDNs were performed. Intra and postoperative data were prospectively collected and analysis on outcome of both techniques was performed. More female patients underwent HARP compared to LDN (75% vs. 40%, P = 0.017). Other baseline characteristics were not significantly different. Median operation time and WIT were shorter in HARP (180 vs. 225 min, P = 0.002 and 3 vs. 5 min, P = 0.007 respectively). Blood loss did not differ (200 ml vs.150 ml, P = 0.39). Intra and postoperative complication rates for HARP and LDN (respectively 10% vs. 25%, P = 0.17 and 5% vs. 15%, P = 0.25) were not significantly different. During median follow‐up of 18 months estimated glomerular filtration rates in donors and recipients and graft‐ and recipient survival did not differ between groups. Hand‐assisted retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy reduces operation and warm ischemia times, and provides at least equal safety. Hand‐assisted retroperitoneoscopic may be a valuable alternative for left‐sided LDN.