眼动脱敏和再加工与CBT治疗创伤后应激障碍的随机对照试验

目的：探讨眼动脱敏和再加工（EMDR）与认知行为疗法（CBT ）对创伤后应激障碍（PTSD）的疗效。方法将符合纳入标准的81例研究对象随机分为EMDR组、CBT组及对照组（各组 n＝27），采用临床PTSD诊断量表（CAPS）、汉密顿焦虑量表（HAMA）、汉密顿抑郁量表（HAMD），在治疗前、后对3组患者PTSD症状及焦虑、抑郁情绪进行评估。结果 EMDR组、CBT组、对照组患者的脱落率分别为29．63％、7．41％、7．41％；EMDR组在CAPS再体验症状评分低于CBT 组，差异有统计学意义（P＝0．036）。结论 EMDR和CBT均是治疗PTSD较为有效的心理治疗方法，EMDR在改善PTSD再体验症状较CBT更为有效，未来的研究应注重稳定化技术的应用以降低EMDR的脱落率。

Randomized control trail of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing versus cognitive behavior therapy for treating posttraumatic stress disorder

Objective To investigate the effects of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) versus cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) for treating adult posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) .Methods A total of 81 patients with PTSD con‐forming to the including standard were randomly allocated to the EMDR group ,CBT group ,and control group ,27 cases per group . The PTSD symptoms ,anxiety and depression moods in 3 groups were assessed before and after treatment by adopting the Clinician‐administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) ,Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) and Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) .Results The drop‐out rates were 29 .63% for the EMDR group ,7 .41% for the CBT group and 7 .41% for the control group respectively ;the re‐experience symptoms score of CAPS in the EMDR group was lower than that in the CBT group with statistical difference (P=0 . 036) .Conclusion Both EMDR and CBT are the effective psychological therapeutic method ,EMDR has more effective than CBT in the reproving the re‐experience symptoms of PTSD .The future studies should pay more attention to the application of stabilization technologies for reducing the dropout rate of EMDR .