首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Aceclofenac–tizanidine in the treatment of acute low back pain: a double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, multicentric, comparative study against aceclofenac alone
Authors:Anil Pareek  Nitin Chandurkar  A. S. Chandanwale  Ratnakar Ambade  Anil Gupta  Girish Bartakke
Affiliation:(1) Medical Affairs and Clinical Research, Ipca Laboratories Ltd., 142 AB, Kandivli Industrial Estate, Kandivli (West), Mumbai, 400067, India;(2) Clinical Research and Development, Ipca Laboratories Ltd., Plot no. 48, International House, Kandivli Industrial Estate, Mumbai, 400067, India;(3) Department of Orthopaedics, J. J. Hospital, K C Marg, Byculla, Mumbai, 400008, India;(4) Department of Orthopaedics, Indira Gandhi Government Medical College, C. A. Road, Nagpur 18, India;(5) Department of Orthopaedics, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Hospital, Sitapura, Jaipur, 302 022, India;(6) Department of Orthopaedics, B. J. Medical College and Sassoon Hospital, Pune, 411001, India
Abstract:Tizanidine and aceclofenac individually have shown efficacy in the treatment of low back pain. The efficacy and tolerability of the combination have not yet been established. The objective of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of aceclofenac-tizanidine fixed dose combination against aceclofenac alone in patients with acute low back pain. This double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, comparative, multicentric, parallel group study enrolled 197 patients of either sex in the age range of 18–70 years with acute low back pain. The patients were randomized to receive either aceclofenac (100 mg)–tizanidine (2 mg) b.i.d or aceclofenac (100 mg) alone b.i.d for 7 days. The primary efficacy outcomes were pain intensity (on movement, at rest and at night; on VAS scale) and pain relief (on a 5-point verbal rating scale). The secondary efficacy outcomes measures included functional impairment (modified Schober’s test and lateral body bending test) and patient’s and investigator’s global efficacy assessment. aceclofenac–tizanidine was significantly superior to aceclofenac for pain intensity (on movement, at rest and at night; P < 0.05) and pain relief (P = 0.00) on days 3 and 7. There was significant increase in spinal flexion in both the groups from baseline on days 3 and 7 with significant difference in favour of the combination group (P < 0.05). There were significantly more number of patients with excellent to good response for the aceclofenac–tizanidine treatment as compared to aceclofenac alone (P = 0.00). Both the treatments were well tolerated. In this study, aceclofenac–tizanidine combination was more effective than aceclofenac alone and had a favourable safety profile in the treatment of acute low back pain.
Keywords:Aceclofenac-tizanidine   Acute LBP   Aceclofenac
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号