首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

危重病教学CBL评估体系的探索
引用本文:胡家昌,张鼎,杜江等. 危重病教学CBL评估体系的探索[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2012, 11(7): 706-708
作者姓名:胡家昌  张鼎  杜江等
作者单位:201620,上海交通大学附属第一人民医院危重病科
基金项目:2010年上海交通大学医学院临床教学示范区项目,2011年上海交通大学医学院课程建设基金,2012年上海交通大学医学院课程建设基金
摘    要:目的探索危重病教学中以病例为基础的学习(Case—basedlearning,CBL)评估方法。方法将53名2010年至2012年在我院实习的上海交通大学医学院临床医学系本科学生分为传统教学组和CBL教学组,CBL教学组采用传统教学结合CBL教学,选择重症急性胰腺炎及多发伤2种重症监护病房(Intesivecareunit,ICU)常见危重病病例为CBL案例。2组学生均在教学实习结束后进行理论知识、迷你临床评估训练(Mini—clinicalevaluationexercise,Mini-CEX)及直接观察操作技能(Directobservationofproceduralskills,DOPS)评估。结果2组在理论知识考核中差异无统计学意义;在Mini-CEX评估中,CBL教学组在医疗面谈能力(P=0.000)、人文关怀(P=0.013)、临床诊断(P=0.035)、咨商卫教(P=0.009)、整体临床能力方面(P=0.008)明显优于传统教学组;CBL案例中所讨论到的气管插管(P=0.016)及中心静脉穿刺(P=0.001)的DOPS评分,CBL教学组明显高于传统教学组。结论传统理论知识考核在CBL教学评估中意义不大;针对临床综合能力及技能操作能力的Mini—CEX及DOPS评估更能体现CBL教学的优势。

关 键 词:以病例为基础的学习  教学评估  迷你临床评估训练  直接观察操作技能
收稿时间:2012-04-10

Exploration on evaluation system of case-based learning in teaching critical diseases
HU Jia-chang , ZHANG Ding , DU Jiang , WANG Rui-lan , YU Kang-long. Exploration on evaluation system of case-based learning in teaching critical diseases[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research, 2012, 11(7): 706-708
Authors:HU Jia-chang    ZHANG Ding    DU Jiang    WANG Rui-lan    YU Kang-long
Affiliation:. Department of ICU, the Affiliated First People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 201620, China
Abstract:Objective To explore the effective evaluation methods of case-based learning (CBL) in critical disease teaching. Methods Totally 53 undergraduate students in department of clin- ical medicine of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, who practiced in our hospital from 2010 to 2012, were divided into the traditional teaching group and CBL teaching group. We used traditional teaching com- bining with CBL teaching in CBL group. Common cases of critical illness( severe acute pancreatitis and multiple trauma)in intensive care unit (ICU) were selected for CBL cases. The evaluation of theoreti- cal knowledge, mini-clinical evaluation exercise(Mini-CEX) and direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS) were continued after teaching and practice. Results These was no significant difference in the theoretical knowledge examination between the two groups. In Mini-CEX, the students in CBL group were better concerning the medical interview capacity ( P = 0. 000 ), humanistic care ( P = 0. 013 ), clinical diagnosis( P = 0. 035 ), counseling( P = 0. 009 ) and the overall clinical competence ( P = 0. 008 ) than those in traditional teaching group. The DOPS scores of endotracheal intubation( P = 0. 016)and central venous catheterization (P = 0. 001 ) discussed in CBL teaching were significantly higher in CBL group. Conclusion Traditional theoretical knowledge examination has little significance in the assessment of CBL teaching , but Mini-CEX and DOPS can reflect the advantages of CBL teach- ing better in the assessment of clinical abilities and skills.
Keywords:Case-based learning  Teaching evaluation  Mini-clinical evaluation exercise  Direct observation of procedural skills
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中华医学教育探索杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中华医学教育探索杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号