The pulsatile GH secretion in acromegaly: Hypothalamic or pituitary origin?*

OBJECTIVE: We studied the effects of different modes of octreotide therapy on the pulsatile pattern of GH release in an attempt to define better its regulation by growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) and somatostatin and its effects on IGF-I plasma levels in acromegaly. DESIGN: In six acromegalic patients not cured by previous treatment we compared the 24-hour GH secretion profiles under basal conditions with subcutaneous (s.c.) bolus injections of 100 micrograms octreotide every 8 hours and with continuous s.c. infusions of the same daily dose. Blood samples were taken every 10 minutes over 24 hours followed by a GHRH test (100 micrograms GHRH i.v.) with blood sampling every 15 minutes for another 2 hours. After a 4-week interval all patients were treated either by the bolus or continuous mode of octreotide application in a randomized cross-over design. On day 4 of treatment blood sampling and GHRH test were repeated. Octreotide treatment was withdrawn for another 4 weeks; all patients then received the alternate application mode and were measured under similar conditions. MEASUREMENTS: Serum GH and plasma IGF-I concentrations were analysed by serial array averaging. IGF-I levels were measured in two different assays with and without previous protein extraction. For GH pulse detection three different algorithms (Cluster, Pulsar, Desade) were applied. RESULTS: With both treatments, the initially elevated basal 24-hour mean serum GH concentrations (58.0 +/- 9.7 mU/l mean +/- SEM) decreased significantly (bolus: 11.5 +/- 4.9 mU/l, P < 0.001 vs basal; continuous infusion: 7.6 +/- 1.9 mU/l, P < 0.001 vs basal) after 4 days. GH suppression was significantly more pronounced following continuous infusion than bolus (P < 0.05). IGF-I plasma concentrations were lowered significantly (P < 0.05) with both forms of treatment which did not differ between themselves. Bolus and continuous infusion treatment significantly inhibited (P < 0.05) the amplitudes of pulsatile GH release, but did not change the pulse frequency. In two of the patients, GHRH stimulation did not increase GH serum levels suggesting a constitutive activation of adenylyl cyclase. CONCLUSION: Continuous subcutaneous octreotide treatment in acromegaly suppresses mean GH levels better than bolus injection. The number of GH pulses remains unaffected by both modes of treatment providing evidence against a somatostatinergic mechanism of pulsatile GH secretion in these patients. The unchanged frequency of pulsatile GH release in the patients unresponsive to exogenous GHRH indicates that this pattern might be independent of hypothalamic GHRH and somatostatin and suggests a pituitary-derived mechanism for GH pulse generation in acromegaly.