金属桩口腔修复与预成纤维桩口腔修复的临床疗效及安全性比较

比较金属桩口腔修复和预成纤维桩口腔修复的临床疗效。方法 选取2022年8月-2023年8月于本院行口腔修复的80例患者为研究对象，按随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组，每组40例。对照组采用金属桩口腔修复，观察组采用预成纤维桩口腔修复，比较两组临床疗效、修复时间、修复成功率、牙周指数、并发症发生率及满意度。结果 观察组修复总有效率为95.00%，高于对照组的75.00%（P ＜0.05）；观察组修复时间短于对照组，修复成功率高于对照组（P ＜0.05）；观察组修复后牙齿松动度、BI、PLI、PD均低于对照组（P ＜0.05）；观察组并发症发生率为2.50%，低于对照组的17.50%（P ＜0.05）；观察组满意度为95.00%，高于对照组的75.00%（P ＜0.05）。结论 相比于金属桩口腔修复，预成纤维桩口腔修复的临床疗效更为理想，其修复时间较短，修复成功率较高，且并发症发生率较低，可有效改善患者的牙周指数，提高患者满意度，值得临床应用。

Comparison of Clinical Efficacy of Metal Post and Prefabricated Fiber Post for Oral Restoration

To compare the clinical efficacy of metal post and prefabricated fiber post for oral restoration. MethodsA total of 80 patients who underwent oral repair in our hospital from August 2022 to August 2023 were selected as the researchobjects and divided into control group and observation group according to the random number table method, with 40 patientsin each group. The control group was treated with metal post for oral restoration, and the observation group was treated withprefabricated fiber post for oral restoration. The clinical efficacy, repair time, repair success rate, periodontal index, complicationrate and satisfaction were compared between the two groups. Results The total effective rate of repair in the observation group was95.00%, which was higher than 75.00% in the control group (P <0.05). The repair time of the observation group was shorter thanthat of the control group, and the success rate of repair was higher than that of the control group (P <0.05). The tooth mobility, BI,PLI and PD in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P <0.05). The incidence of complications in theobservation group was 2.50%, which was lower than 17.50% in the control group (P <0.05). The satisfaction rate of the observationgroup was 95.00%, which was higher than 75.00% of the control group (P <0.05). Conclusion Compared with metal post for oralrestoration, the clinical efficacy of prefabricated fiber post is more ideal. Its repair time is shorter, the success rate of repair is higher,and the incidence of complications is lower. Meanwhile, it can effectively improve the patient''s periodontal index and improvepatient satisfaction, which is worthy of clinical application.