电针与帕罗西汀治疗惊恐障碍的临床疗效

目的 比较电针疗法与帕罗西汀片治疗惊恐障碍的疗效和安全性。方法 将59例随机分为电针组(30例)和帕罗西汀组(29例),疗程为4周。在治疗前及治疗1、2、4、8周时采用焦虑自评量表(SAS)、汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMA)、疗效指数(CGI-EI)、Barthel指数(BI)量表评定疗效和不良反应。结果 电针组总有效率为86.66%,帕罗西汀组为82.76%,两组疗效差异无统计学意义;疗效指数及起效时间两组间有显著差异,电针组起效时间短、不良反应少。结论 两种方法治疗惊恐障碍疗效相当,但电针疗法起效时间短、疗效指数高、不良反应少。

Clinical efficacy for electro-acupuncture and paroxetine in treatment of panic disorder

Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of the treatment of panic disorder by electro-acupuncture(EA) and paroxetine.Methods 59 patients were randomly divided into paroxetine group (30 cases) and EA group (29 cases), the therapeutic course was 4 weeks. SAS, HAMA, CGI-EI, BI scale were given to evaluate the efficacy and adverse reactions at 1, 2, 4 weekend before treatment and after treatment.Results EA group total effective rate was 86.66%, the paroxetine group total effective rate was 82.76%, the two groups total efficacy difference was not statistically significant; efficacy index and onset time between the two groups had significant differences.Conclusion The overall curative effects were similar in patients of the two groups, but onset short electro-acupuncture, the curative effect was high and adverse reactions were fewer.