经脐单孔与常规腹腔镜胆囊切除术的对比研究

目的比较经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术（TUSPLC）与常规腹腔镜胆囊切除术（LC）的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析2010年5月至2010年10月确诊为无严重胆囊炎症的胆囊息肉或胆囊结石患者共56例,随机分为单孔组和常规组,比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、术后镇痛、术后住院时间及术后并发症。结果单孔组26例患者23例顺利完成手术,3例中转改LC;常规组30例患者均顺利完成手术。单孔组与常规组手术时间分别为（52.45±10.84）min和（39.29±8.61）min（t=5.0601,P=0.0000）,术中出血量分别为（19.32±5.69）ml和（22.17±6.27）ml（t=1.7703,P=0.0823）;术后需镇痛分别为1例和6例（χ2=0.0702,P=0.7910）;术后住院时间分别为（2.52±1.37）d和（2.57±1.16）d（t=0.7396,P=0.4628）。除手术时间两组有明显差异外（P〈0.05）,余两组观察指标差异均无统计学意义（P〉0.05）。两组均无出血、胆漏、胆管损伤等并发症发生。结论经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与常规腹腔镜胆囊切除术一样安全、可行,具有瘢痕不明显且隐避,术后患者疼痛轻、恢复快等优点,在胆囊切除中占有一席之地。但对患者技术和设备要求较高。

Comparative study of trans-umbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and routine laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Objective To analyze the clinical results of trans-umbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and routine laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Methods From May 2010 to October 2010,the clinical data of 56 patients with cholecystis polypus or cholecystolithiasis were analyzed retrospectively.The patients were randomly divided into two groups:30 patients in routine group and 26 patients in singe-port group.The routine group underwent cholecystectomy under a routine laparoscope and the single-port group underw...