首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

子宫内膜癌细胞中细胞膜雌激素受体表达的初步研究
引用本文:Wang ZQ,Wang JL,Wei LH,Zhao D,Gao M,Guo RX. 子宫内膜癌细胞中细胞膜雌激素受体表达的初步研究[J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2006, 41(7): 471-475
作者姓名:Wang ZQ  Wang JL  Wei LH  Zhao D  Gao M  Guo RX
作者单位:100044,北京大学人民医院妇科
摘    要:目的探讨子宫内膜癌细胞中细胞膜雌激素受体的表达情况。方法对子宫内膜癌高分化细胞系Ishikawa和中分化细胞系HEC-1A的细胞膜和整个细胞(包括细胞膜、细胞质和细胞核)雌激素受体(ER)α、β表达情况进行研究。用来检测细胞膜雌激素受体的细胞经固定处理,用来检测整个细胞ER的细胞经渗透处理,分别对固定与渗透处理的Ishikawa和HEC-1A细胞进行间接免疫荧光染色,并在荧光显微镜下观察ER的分布。另对Ishikawa和HEC-1A活细胞(用来检测细胞膜雌激素受体)、渗透处理的Ishikawa和HEC-1A细胞(用来检测整个细胞ER)进行间接免疫荧光染色,并用流式细胞仪检测ER的相对荧光强度来表示ER的表达强度。以上实验均以未用一抗的细胞为阴性对照。结果荧光显微镜下观察显示,固定处理的Ishikawa和HEC-1A细胞膜均可见ERα和ERβ标记的荧光,渗透处理的Ishikawa和HEC-1A细胞,除细胞膜外,在细胞内部也可见ERα和ERβ标记的荧光。流式细胞仪检测显示,Ishikawa活细胞ERα及ERβ相对荧光强度分别为1.09±0.21和1.27±0.33,高于阴性对照(均为1.00),但两者分别与阴性对照比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);渗透处理的Ishikawa细胞ERα及ERβ相对荧光强度分别为4.21±0.34和4.69±1.96,均高于活细胞,两者分别与活细胞比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。HEC-1A活细胞ERα及ERβ相对荧光强度分别为1.58±0.13和1.49±0.04,高于阴性对照(均为1.00),与阴性对照分别比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);渗透处理的HEC-1A细胞ERα及ERβ相对荧光强度分别为2.34±0.33和2.52±0.15,均高于活细胞,两者分别与活细胞比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论子宫内膜癌细胞系Ishikawa和HEC-1A细胞中均存在细胞膜雌激素受体。

关 键 词:子宫内膜肿瘤 细胞膜 受体  雌激素 细胞系  肿瘤
收稿时间:2005-09-08
修稿时间:2005-09-08

Preliminary study of membrane estrogen receptor expression in endometrial carcinoma cells
Wang Zhi-qi,Wang Jian-liu,Wei Li-hui,Zhao Dan,Gao Min,Guo Rui-xia. Preliminary study of membrane estrogen receptor expression in endometrial carcinoma cells[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2006, 41(7): 471-475
Authors:Wang Zhi-qi  Wang Jian-liu  Wei Li-hui  Zhao Dan  Gao Min  Guo Rui-xia
Affiliation:Department of Gynecology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China.
Abstract:OBJECTIVE: To analyze if there are membrane estrogen receptors (ER) in endometrial carcinoma and if there is some relationship between membrane ER and nuclear ER. METHODS: The cell membrane and total cell ERalpha and ERbeta expressions of high and moderate differentiation endometrial carcinoma cells (Ishikawa and HEC-1A cells) were analyzed. Intermittent immunofluorescence dyeing and fluorescent microscopy were carried out with the cells treated with polyformaldehyde and Triton X-100. Intermittent immunofluorescence dyeing and flow cytometry were carried out with the live cells and the cells treated with Triton X-100 respectively. RESULTS: There were fluorescences on the membrane of the Ishikawa and HEC-1A cells which were treated with polyformaldehyde. When the cells were treated with Triton X-100, the fluorescences were also seen inside the cells. The fluorescence intensity of ERalpha and ERbeta in Ishikawa cell membrane (1.09 +/- 0.21, 1.27 +/- 0.33) was stronger than the control, but there were no significant differences (P > 0.05). When treated with Triton X-100, the total cell fluorescence intensity of ERalpha and ERbeta in Ishikawa cell (4.21 +/- 0.34, 4.69 +/- 1.96) was stronger than the membrane (P < 0.05). The ERalpha and ERbeta fluorescence intensity of HEC-1A cell membrane (1.58 +/- 0.13, 1.49 +/- 0.04) were stronger than the control (P < 0.05). The fluorescence intensity of ERalpha and ERbeta of the HEC-1A cell (2.34 +/- 0.33, 2.52 +/- 0.15) was stronger than the membrane also (P < 0.05). The membrane ERalpha fluorescence intensity of Ishikawa was lower than HEC-1A (P = 0.028). But the total cell ERalpha fluorescence intensity of Ishikawa was higher than HEC-1A (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: There are membrane ER on endometrial carcinoma cells Ishikawa and HEC-1A. The membrane ER must have some similarity to the nuclear receptor. There is no direct correlation between the quantity of the membrane ER and nuclear ER.
Keywords:Endometrial neoplasms   Cell membrane    Receptors, estrogen    Cell line, tumor
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号