颈椎牵引与SSP联合治疗颈椎病疗效评价

目的比较单纯颈椎牵引治疗与颈椎牵引加点刺激镇痛治疗(SilverSpikePoint,SSP)联合治疗颈椎病的疗效。方法140例颈椎病患者随机分为颈椎牵引加SSP联合治疗组(治疗组),单纯颈椎牵引治疗组(对照组);治疗进行15天,治疗前后分别利用颈椎病临床评价量表(ClinicalAssessmentScaleforCervicalSpondylosis,CASCS)对颈椎病人进行评分,对其评测结果和疗效进行统计学比较分析。结果治疗前两组CASCS评分差异无显著性意义(P>0.05),两组在治疗前后评测结果差异有显著性意义(P<0.01),治疗后两组之间评分分值差异有显著性意义(P<0.01)。结论虽然两组治疗前后评分差异均有显著性意义,但颈椎牵引加SSP联合治疗较单纯牵引治疗效果好。

CURATIVE EFFECTS ASSESSMENT OF CERVICAL SPONDYLOSIS TREATMENT WITH A COMBINATION OF CERVICAL TRACTION AND SSP

Objective To assess and compare the curative effects for cervical spondylosis after treatment with a combination of cervical traction and Silver Spike Point (SSP) and with only cervical traction. Methods A total of 140 cervical spondylosis patients were randomly divided into two groups: the treatment group and the control group, with the former treated with a combination of cervical traction and SSP and the later with only cervical traction. The treatment lasted 15 days. All patients were measured by the Clinical Assessment Scale for Cervical Spondylosis (CASCS) before and after treatment, and the results and curative effects were compared statistically. Results There was no significant difference between the two groups' CASCS scores before treatment (P>0.05); there was highly significant difference before and after treatment within each group (P<0.01); and there was also highly significant difference after treatment between the two groups. The difference was highly significant between the two group's curative effect after treatment (P<0.01). Conclusion Although there was highly significant difference between CASCS scores before and after treatment for both groups, the treatment is more efficient with a combination of cervical traction and SSP than with only cervical traction.