头尾联合入路和内侧入路在腹腔镜根治性右半结肠切除术中的对比研究

目的:探讨头尾联合入路和内侧入路在腹腔镜根治性右半结肠切除术的临床近期疗效及并发症。方法:回顾性分析2015年1月至2019年12月期间由徐州医科大学附属医院收治的91例腹腔镜根治性右半结肠切除术患者的临床资料,分为50例接受头尾联合入路组和41例接受内侧入路组。针对两组入路手术时间、术中出血量、Henle干及其属支损伤率、因Henle干及其属支损伤致中转开腹率、淋巴结清扫数量、阳性淋巴结数量、术后肠功能恢复时间、腹腔引流管拔除时间、术后住院时间及术后并发症等临床指标评价并分析头尾联合入路的潜在优势。结果:头尾联合入路组在手术时间上显著短于内侧入路组[180(150～188)min vs. 210(180～255)min,P<0.05]、术中出血量显著少于内侧入路组[50(50～50)mL vs. 100(50～100)mL,P<0.05]、Henle干及其属支损伤率显著低于内侧入路组[0例vs. 6例,P<0.05]。两组因Henle干及其属支损伤致中转开腹率、淋巴结清扫数量、阳性淋巴结数量、术后肠功能恢复时间、腹腔引流管拔除时间、术后住院时间及术后淋巴漏等并发症发...

Comparative study of laparoscopic radical right hemicolectomy via the head-tail and medial approaches

  Objective  To investigate the short-term clinical efficacy and complications of laparoscopic radical right hemicolectomy via the head-tail and medial approaches.  Methods  Clinical data of 91 patients admitted for laparoscopic radical right hemicolectomy at Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University between January 2015 and December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Of those patients, 50 and 41 patients underwent laparoscopic radical right hemicolectomy via the head-tail and medial approaches, respectively. According to the clinical indicators such as operation time, amount of intraoperative blood loss, rate of injury of Henle trunk and its branches (an indicator of conversion to laparotomy), number of lymph nodes dissected, number of positive lymph nodes, postoperative intestinal function recovery time, postoperative abdominal drainage tube removal time, postoperative hospitalization time, and postoperative complications, the potential advantages of laparoscopic radical right hemicolectomy via the head-tail approach were evaluated and analyzed.  Results  The operation time was significantly shorter[180 (150-188) min vs. 210 (180-255) min, P < 0.05], amount of intraoperative blood loss was significantly smaller[50 (50-50) mL vs. 100 (50-100) mL], P < 0.05), and rates of injury of Henle trunk and its branches (0 case vs. 6 cases, P < 0.05) were significantly lower in the head-tail approach group than in the medial approach group. We found no statistically significant differences between the two groups with the conversion rate to laparotomy due to injuries of Henle trunk and its branches, number of lymph nodes dissected, number of positive lymph nodes, postoperative intestinal function recovery time, postoperative abdominal drainage tube removal time, postoperative hospitalization time, postoperative lymph leakage, and other complications (P>0.05).  Conclusions  Compared with the commonly used medial approach in clinical practice, laparoscopic radical right hemicolectomy via the head-tail approach showed obvious improvement with respect to operative time, amount of intraoperative blood loss, and the injury rate of Henle trunk and its branches. Thus, the head-tail approach had higher operative safety and is thus worthy of further clinical application.