首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

紫杉醇联合阿帕替尼对比单药紫杉醇二线治疗胃癌的真实世界前瞻性研究
引用本文:赵妍,张明晖,孙雅丽,杨春洁,杨艳,韩雨.紫杉醇联合阿帕替尼对比单药紫杉醇二线治疗胃癌的真实世界前瞻性研究[J].中国肿瘤临床,2020,47(15):784-787.
作者姓名:赵妍  张明晖  孙雅丽  杨春洁  杨艳  韩雨
作者单位:内蒙古医科大学赤峰临床医学院(赤峰市医院)肿瘤内三科(内蒙古自治区赤峰市 024000)
基金项目:内蒙古自治区卫生计生科研计划项目201703212
摘    要:目的:观察紫杉醇联合阿帕替尼对比单药紫杉醇二线治疗胃癌的疗效及安全性.方法:选取2017年3月至2018年3月就诊于内蒙古医科大学赤峰临床医学院经一线(氟尿嘧啶类联合铂类)治疗后进展的HER-2阴性的晚期胃癌患者60例,分为单药组和联合组,每组30例.单药组给予单药紫杉醇化疗,联合组给予紫杉醇联合阿帕替尼治疗,观察的主要终点为两组患者的无进展生存期(progression-free survival,PFS),次要终点为疾病控制率(disease control rate,DCR)、客观缓解率(objective response rate,ORR)、安全性.结果:联合组患者的PFS优于单药组患者,两组相比差异有统计学意义(P<0.001).联合组DCR、ORR均高于单药组,但差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05);联合组高血压发生率高于单药组(P<0.05),其余不良反应发生率差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05).结论:紫杉醇联合甲磺酸阿帕替尼对比单药紫杉醇二线治疗胃癌,联合组PFS、DCR、ORR均优于单药组,虽然联合组DCR、ORR较单药组相比差异无统计学意义,但联合组组患者的PFS较单组延长,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),且联合组不良反应可耐受,安全性良好.

关 键 词:胃癌  紫杉醇  阿帕替尼  疗效  安全性
收稿时间:2020-03-20

Prospective study on paclitaxel combined with apatinib mesylate in comparison with paclitaxel alone as the second-line treatment for gastric cancer
Yan Zhao,Minghui Zhang,Yali Sun,Chunjie Yang,Yan Yang,Yu Han.Prospective study on paclitaxel combined with apatinib mesylate in comparison with paclitaxel alone as the second-line treatment for gastric cancer[J].Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology,2020,47(15):784-787.
Authors:Yan Zhao  Minghui Zhang  Yali Sun  Chunjie Yang  Yan Yang  Yu Han
Institution:Department of Oncology, Chifeng Municipal Hospital, Chifeng Clinical Medical School of inner Mongolia Medical University, Chifeng 024000, China
Abstract:  Objective   To investigate the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel combined with apatinib in comparison with paclitaxel alone as the second-line treatment for gastric cancer.   Methods  Patients with advanced gastric cancer who had been treated at Chifeng Municipal Hospital, Chifeng Clinical Medical School of inner Mongolia Medical University, from March 2017 to March 2018 were enrolled. Inclusion criteria were human epidermal growth factor receptor-2(HER-2)-negative cancer and progression after the first-line treatment with fluorouracil combined with platinum. Patients were divided into groups administered with a single drug and combination of drugs. The single-drug group was administered with paclitaxel chemotherapy, while the combined-drug group with the paclitaxel combined with apatinib treatment. In both groups, the primary endpoint of observation was progression-free survival (PFS), while the secondary endpoint was the disease control rate (DCR), overall response rate (ORR), and safety.   Results  A total of 60 patients were enrolled, including 30 patients in each of single- and combined-drug groups. PFS was significantly better in the combined-drug group than in the single-drug group (P < 0.001). DCR and ORR were higher in the combined-drug group than in the single-drug group, but without statistical significance (P>0.05). The incidence of hypertension was significantly higher in the combined-drug group than in the single-drug group (P < 0.05), while the incidence of other adverse reactions showed no significant difference between the groups (P>0.05).   Conclusions  Paclitaxel combined with apatinib mesylate is superior to paclitaxel alone in the second-line treatment of gastric cancer. PFS, DCR, and ORR are superior with paclitaxel combined with apatinib mesylate than with paclitaxel alone. Although DCR and ORR in the combined-drug group were not significantly different from those in the single-drug group, the PFS was significantly longer in the combined-drug group, and the toxic and side effects of paclitaxel combined with apatinib mesylate were tolerable and safe. 
Keywords:gastric cancer  paclitaxel  apatinib  efficacy  safety
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国肿瘤临床》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国肿瘤临床》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号