International expert workshop on the analysis of the economic and public health impacts of air pollution: workshop summary |
| |
Authors: | Bell Michelle L Davis Devra Cifuentes Luis Cohen Aaron Gouveia Nelson Grant Lester Green Collin Johnson Todd Rogat Jorge Spengler Jack Thurston George |
| |
Affiliation: | Department of Geography and Environmental Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA. chelbell@jhu.edu |
| |
Abstract: | Forty-nine experts from 18 industrial and developing countries met on 6 September 2001 in Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany, to discuss the economic and public health impacts of air pollution, particularly with respect to assessing the public health benefits from technologies and policies that reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Such measures would provide immediate public health benefits, such as reduced premature mortality and chronic morbidity, through improved local air quality. These mitigation strategies also allow long-term goals--for example, reducing the buildup of GHG emissions--to be achieved alongside short-term aims, such as immediate improvements in air quality, and therefore benefits to public health. The workshop aimed to foster research partnerships by improving collaboration and communication among various agencies and researchers; providing a forum for presentations by sponsoring agencies and researchers regarding research efforts and agency activities; identifying key issues, knowledge gaps, methodological shortcomings, and research needs; and recommending activities and initiatives for research, collaboration, and communication. This workshop summary briefly describes presentations made by workshop participants and the conclusions of three separate working groups: economics, benefits transfer, and policy; indoor air quality issues and susceptible populations; and development and transfer of dose-response relationships and exposure models in developing countries. Several common themes emerged from the working group sessions and subsequent discussion. Key recommendations include the need for improved communication and extended collaboration, guidance and support for researchers, advances in methods, and resource support for data collection, assessment, and research. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 PubMed 等数据库收录! |
|