首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

2种用药方案治疗慢性无菌性前列腺炎的成本-效果分析
引用本文:黎行山,黄美兴,杨晓,向思英.2种用药方案治疗慢性无菌性前列腺炎的成本-效果分析[J].中国药房,2008,19(5):323-324.
作者姓名:黎行山  黄美兴  杨晓  向思英
作者单位:广州医学院港湾医院,广州市,510700
摘    要:目的:比较2种用药方案治疗慢性无菌性前列腺炎的经济学效果。方法:103例慢性无菌性前列腺炎患者随机分成2组,分别给予口服前列通淤胶囊+前列安栓纳肛(A组)、前列安栓纳肛(B组)治疗,疗程均为30d,运用成本-效果分析法进行评价。结果:A、B组总成本分别为592.2、280.8元,总有效率分别为92.31%、82.35%(P>0.05)。结论:B组方案患者依从性好,更经济。

关 键 词:慢性无菌性前列腺炎  前列通淤胶囊  前列安栓  成本-效果分析
文章编号:1001-0408(2008)05-0323-02
收稿时间:2007-03-01
修稿时间:2007-08-01

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Two Therapeutic Schemes for Chronic Abacterial Prostatitis
LI Hang-shan,HUANG Mei-xing,YANG Xiao,XIANG Si-ying.Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Two Therapeutic Schemes for Chronic Abacterial Prostatitis[J].China Pharmacy,2008,19(5):323-324.
Authors:LI Hang-shan  HUANG Mei-xing  YANG Xiao  XIANG Si-ying
Institution:(Gangwan Hospital of Guangzhou Medical College, Guangzhou 510700, China)
Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To compare the pharmacoeconomic efficacy between 2 therapeutic schemes for chronic abacterial prostatitis.METHODS:A total of 103 patients with chronic abacterial prostatitis were randomly assigned to receive Qianlieton-gyu plus Prostant(Group A)or Prostant alone(Group B)for 30 days.A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted for the eva-luation of the two schemes.RESULTS:The total costs of Group A vs.Group B were 592.2yuan vs.280.8yuan,and the effective rates were 92.31 vs.82.35%(P>0.05).CONCLUSION:Scheme B has better compliance and is more economical as compared with scheme A.
Keywords:Chronic abacterial prostatitis  Qianlietongyu capsule  Prostant  Cost-effectiveness analysis
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号