Faecal elastase 1: not helpful in diagnosing chronic pancreatitisassociated with mild to moderate exocrine pancreatic insufficiency

Background/Aim—The suggestion that estimation offaecal elastase 1 is a valuable new tubeless pancreatic function testwas evaluated by comparing it with faecal chymotrypsin estimation inpatients categorised according to grades of exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) based on the gold standard tests, thesecretin-pancreozymin test (SPT) and faecal fat analysis.
Methods—In 64 patients in whom EPI was suspected,the following tests were performed: SPT, faecal fat analysis, faecalchymotrypsin estimation, faecal elastase 1 estimation. EPI was gradedaccording to the results of the SPT and faecal fat analysis as absent,mild, moderate, or severe. The upper limit of normal for faecalelastase 1 was taken as 200 µg/g, and for faecal chymotrypsin 3 U/gstool. Levels between 3 and 6 U/g stool for faecal chymotrypsin areusually considered to be suspicious for EPI. In this study, both 3 and 6 U/g stool were evaluated as the upper limit of normal.
Results—Exocrine pancreatic function was normal in34 patients, of whom 94, 91, and 79% had normal faecal elastase 1 andfaecal chymotrypsin levels (<3 U/g and <6 U/g) respectively. Thirtypatients had EPI, of whom 53, 37, and 57% had abnormal faecal enzymelevels (differences not significant). When EPI was graded as mild,moderate, or severe, 63% of patients had mild to moderate EPI, and37% had severe EPI. In the latter group, between 73 and 91% ofpatients had abnormal faecal enzymes. In the group with mild tomoderate EPI, abnormal test results were obtained for both faecalenzymes in less than 50% of the patients (differences notsignificant). Some 40% of the patients had pancreatic calcifications.There were no significant differences for either faecal enzyme between the two groups with and without pancreatic calcifications. In 62% ofthe patients who underwent an endoscopic retrogradecholangiopancreatography (ERCP), abnormal duct changes were found.Again, there were no significant differences for either faecal enzymebetween the two groups with abnormal and normal ERCP.
Conclusion—Estimation of faecal elastase 1 is notdistinctly superior to the traditional faecal chymotrypsin estimation.The former is particularly helpful only in detecting severe EPI, but not the mild to moderate form, which poses the more frequent and difficult clinical problem and does not correlate significantly withthe severe morphological changes seen in chronic pancreatitis.

Keywords:faecal elastase 1; faecal chymotrypsin; secretin-pancreozymin test; faecal fat analysis; exocrine pancreaticinsufficiency; diagnosis