身心放松疗法在急性心肌梗死恢复期患者护理中的临床应用

目的 探讨身心放松疗法在急性心肌梗死恢复期患者护理中的临床应用价值.方法 将168例初发急性心肌梗死恢复期患者按入院顺序先后随机分为研究组84例和对照组84例.研究组患者在常规药物治疗护理的同时给予身心放松疗法措施干预,而对照组患者只给予常规药物治疗护理,干预后分别采用焦虑自评量表（SAS）和抑郁自评量表（SDS）测定两组急性心肌梗死恢复期患者的心理状况,同时观察两组患者再发心肌梗死的发生率,并且进行对照比较.结果 研究组急性心肌梗死恢复期患者焦虑分值和抑郁分值均明显低于对照组患者,两组比较,u值分别为4.95、4.99,差异均有统计学意义（P＜0.01）;研究组急性心肌梗死恢复期患者再发心肌梗死的发生率为9.52％,而对照组患者再发心肌梗死的发生率为28.57％,两组比较,x2值为9.88,差异有统计学意义（P＜0.01）.结论 身心放松疗法可明显消除急性心肌梗死恢复期患者的心理障碍,大大地降低患者再发心肌梗死的发生率,进一步促进康复,从而达到最大限度地维护急性心肌梗死恢复期患者健康的目的.

Clinic application for patients suffered from acute myocardial infarction under nursing of body and mind relaxing therapy in recovery period

Objective To explore the clinic application value for the patients suffered from the acute myocardial infarction under nursing of body and mind relaxes therapy in recovery period. Methods 168 cases of the patients suffered from the initial occurrence of acute myocardial infarction of the recovery period were separately divided into 84 cases as the research group and 84 cases as the control group in the order of entering hospital at random. The patients of the research group were given by the measure interference of the body and mind based on normal medical treatment and nursing. But the control group is only given by the normal medical treatment and nursing. Two groups of patients separately use（SAS） and （SDS）to test the psychology situation of the patients of two groups and observe the occurrence rate of acute myocardial infarction of the patients of two groups for the comparison after the interference. Results The anxious mark and depressed mark of the research group are lower than that of the control group evidently for the comparison of two groups of the patients suffered from the acute myocardial infarction in the recovery period, u value is 4.95 and 4.99 with evident difference of statistics meaning （P 〈 0.01 ）. The occurrence rate of the patients suffered from the acute myocardial infarction of the research group in the recovery period was 9.52%. The occurrence rate of the patients suffered from the acute myocardial infarction of the control group in the recovery period is 28.57% for the comparison. X2 value was 9.88 with evident difference of statistics meaning （ P 〈 0. 01 ）. Conclusions The body and mind relaxing therapy could evidently eliminate psychological block of the patients suffered from the acute myocardial infarction under the body and mind relaxing therapy in the recovery period. This could drop the occurrence rate of the patients suffered from the acute myocardial infarction and promote the health recovery so as to reach maintaining the healthy purpose of the patients suff