Orthotropic nystagmus in predicting the efficacy of treatment in posterior canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo

ObjectiveTo observe the type of nystagmus in each position of posterior semicircular canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) after treatment with the Epley maneuver and analyze the relationship between the type of nystagmus in the second and third positions of the Epley maneuver and the effect of treatment. Then, the role of orthotropic nystagmus in predicting the success of posterior semicircular canal BPPV treatment was explored.MethodsTwo hundred seventy-six patients diagnosed with posterior semicircular canal BPPV who were admitted from September 2018 to October 2019 to Zhejiang Hospital were included. All patients were treated with BPPV diagnosis and treatment system (Epley maneuver). During the treatment, we observed and recorded the type of nystagmus in the second and third positions, including the direction and duration of nystagmus. One hour after the first treatment, all patients were evaluated by both the Dix-Hallpike and Roll tests to determine whether the treatment was successful. The difference in the success rate of treatment between different types of nystagmus was compared, and the differences in sensitivity and specificity of orthotropic nystagmus in the second and third positions in predicting the effect of treatment were compared.ResultsAmong the 234 patients who had successful repositioning for the first time, the proportion of orthotropic nystagmus during the third position of the Epley maneuver was 88.9%, which was significantly higher than 23% in the unsuccessful group (42 cases) (P < 0.05) The proportion of patients with reversed nystagmus (4.7% vs 33.3%, P < 0.05) and no nystagmus (6.4% vs 42.9%, P < 0.05) was lower in the successful group than in the unsuccessful group. The proportion of orthotropic nystagmus during the second position of the Epley maneuver was 50.9%, which was also higher than the 19% in the unsuccessful group (P < 0.05). The proportion of reversed nystagmus (13.7% vs 31%, P < 0.05) was lower in the successful group than in the unsuccessful group. Additionally, the proportion of no nystagmus (35.5% vs 50%, P = 0.074) was lower in the successful group than in the unsuccessful group, but the difference was not statistically significant. The sensitivity of orthotropic nystagmus in the third position (88.9%) of the Epley maneuver in predicting the efficacy of treatment was higher than that of orthotropic nystagmus in the second position (50.9%), but there was no significant difference in specificity between the two.ConclusionOrthotropic nystagmus during the Epley maneuver, especially in the third position, has certain value in predicting the efficacy of posterior semicircular canal BPPV repositioning, which is better than its predictive effect in the second position, whereas reversed nystagmus or no nystagmus in the third position is suggestive of unsuccessful repositioning. Therefore, clinicians can carry out individualized treatments based on nystagmus types during repositioning to improve the effect of treatment.