Minimal vs extensive esophageal mobilization during laparoscopic fundoplication: a prospective randomized trial |
| |
Authors: | St Peter Shawn D Barnhart Douglas C Ostlie Daniel J Tsao KuoJen Leys Charles M Sharp Susan W Bartle Donna Morgan Tracey Harmon Carroll M Georgeson Keith E Holcomb George W |
| |
Affiliation: | a The Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO 64108, USAb University of Alabama in Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA |
| |
Abstract: | PurposeLaparoscopic Nissen fundoplication has been traditionally performed with extensive esophageal dissection to create 2 to 3 cm of intraabdominal esophagus. Retrospective data have suggested that minimal esophageal mobilization may reduce the risk of postoperative herniation of the wrap into the lower mediastinum. To compare complete esophageal dissection to leaving the phrenoesophageal attachment intact, we conducted a 2-center, prospective, randomized trial.MethodsAfter obtaining permission/assent, patients were randomized to circumferential division of the phrenoesophageal attachments (MAX) or minimal mobilization with no violation of the phrenoesophageal membrane (MIN). A contrast study was performed at 1 year. The primary outcome variable was postoperative wrap herniation.ResultsOne hundred seventy-seven patients were enrolled in the study (MIN, n = 90; MAX, n = 87) from February 2006 to May 2008. There were no differences in demographics or operative time. Contrast studies were performed in 64 MIN and 71 MAX patients, respectively. The transmigration rate was 30% in the MAX group compared with 7.8% in the MIN group (P = .002). The reoperation rate was 18.4% in the MAX group and 3.3% in the MIN group (P = .006)ConclusionsMinimal esophageal mobilization during laparoscopic fundoplication decreases postoperative wrap transmigration and the need for a redo operation. |
| |
Keywords: | GERD Fundoplication Crural dissection Hiatal hernia |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect PubMed 等数据库收录! |
|