首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

后装放疗剂量验证软件研究
引用本文:王先良,王培,李厨荣,黎杰,康盛伟,刘敏,汤婷,吴章文,侯氢. 后装放疗剂量验证软件研究[J]. 中华放射肿瘤学杂志, 2010, 29(2): 131-135. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2020.02.012
作者姓名:王先良  王培  李厨荣  黎杰  康盛伟  刘敏  汤婷  吴章文  侯氢
作者单位:四川省肿瘤医院放疗科,成都 610041;
四川大学原子核科学技术研究所辐射物理及技术教育部重点实验室,成都 610064
基金项目:四川省重点研发项目(2017GZ0322、2018GZ0197);国家重点研发计划(2016YFC0105103)
摘    要:目的 报道一套独立后装放疗剂量验证软件的实现方法和结果。方法 后装放疗剂量验证软件采用模块化结构设计,以Visual C++为开发平台,剂量计算算法采用AAPM TG 43报告推荐的公式。回顾性选择已完成治疗的宫颈癌患者6例,每例患者都使用了不同的施源器,用剂量体积直方图参数和γ通过率(0.1cm,5%)评估验证软件和计划系统剂量计算结果的偏差。结果 与计划系统剂量计算结果相比,验证软件剂量计算结果的γ通过率均>98%。靶区D100%和D90%的偏差最大值分别为0.29%和0.53%,危及器官D0.1cm3、D1cm3、D2cm3的偏差均<0.5%。结论 仅需极少的人机交互,该剂量验证软件能验证后装临床治疗计划剂量计算的准确性。

关 键 词:后装放疗  剂量验证  治疗计划系统  质量控制  
收稿时间:2018-06-23

A study of an independent dose verification software for brachytherapy
Wang Xianliang,Wang Pei,Li Churong,Li Jie,Kang Shengwei,Liu Min,Tang Ting,Wu Zhangwen,Hou Qing. A study of an independent dose verification software for brachytherapy[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology, 2010, 29(2): 131-135. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2020.02.012
Authors:Wang Xianliang  Wang Pei  Li Churong  Li Jie  Kang Shengwei  Liu Min  Tang Ting  Wu Zhangwen  Hou Qing
Affiliation:Department of Radiation Oncology,Sichuan Cancer Hospital& Institute,Chengdu,610041,China;
Key Laboratory of Radiation Physics and Technology,Institute of Nuclear Science and Technology,Sichuan University,Chengdu,610064,China
Abstract:Objective To report an implementation method and results of an independent brachytherapy dose verification software (DVS). Methods The DVS was developed based on Visual C++ and the modular structure design was adopted. The DICOM RT files exported from the treatment planning system (TPS) were automatically loaded into the DVS. The TG-43 formalism was employed for dose calculation. Six cervical cancer patients who underwent brachytherapy were retrospectively selected to test the DVS. Different applicators were utilized for each patient. Dosimetric parameters and γ analysis (0.1cm, 5%) were used to evaluate the dose difference between the DVS and the TPS. Results Compared with the TPS dose,the γ pass rates of the doses calculated by the DVS were higher than 98%. For CTV, the dosimetric differences were less than 0.29% and 0.53% for D100% and D90%. For bladder, rectum and sigmoid, the agreement of D0.1cm3, D1cm3and D2cm3 within a 0.5% level. Conclusion With minimal human-computer interactions, the DVS can verify the accuracy of dose calculated by TPS for brachytherapy.
Keywords:Brachytherapy  Dose verification  Treatment planning system  Quality assurance  
点击此处可从《中华放射肿瘤学杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中华放射肿瘤学杂志》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号