首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

超声引导下介入治疗莫顿神经瘤
引用本文:谭丽,陈凯,全杰荣,张允,陈琴. 超声引导下介入治疗莫顿神经瘤[J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2019, 35(5): 750-753
作者姓名:谭丽  陈凯  全杰荣  张允  陈琴
作者单位:四川省医学科学院.四川省人民医院超声科, 四川 成都 610072,四川省医学科学院.四川省人民医院超声科, 四川 成都 610072,四川省医学科学院.四川省人民医院超声科, 四川 成都 610072,四川省医学科学院.四川省人民医院中医骨科, 四川 成都 610072,四川省医学科学院.四川省人民医院超声科, 四川 成都 610072
摘    要:目的 探讨超声引导下介入治疗莫顿神经瘤的临床效果。方法 将36例莫顿神经瘤患者随机分为观察组(n=19)和对照组(n=17例)。对观察组进行超声引导下介入治疗,对照组给予传统封闭治疗。观察2组患者治疗过程中是否出现血管、肌腱损伤,治疗后8周内是否出现感染等并发症。分别于治疗前及治疗后4、8周进行疼痛数字评价量表(NRS)评分;于治疗前及治疗后8周比较肿瘤最大径。结果 2组患者治疗过程中均未见血管、肌腱损伤等并发症。对照组6例治疗后8周内出现局部感染,经对症治疗后缓解。观察组患者治疗后4、8周NRS评分均较治疗前降低(P均<0.01);对照组患者治疗后4周NRS评分较治疗前降低(P<0.01),而治疗后8周与治疗前及治疗后4周差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。治疗前及治疗后4周,2组患者NRS评分差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05);治疗后8周,观察组患者NRS评分较对照组降低(P<0.001)。治疗前及治疗后8周2组肿瘤最大径差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。结论 超声引导下介入治疗莫顿神经瘤安全、有效。

关 键 词:神经瘤,莫顿    超声检查,介入性
收稿时间:2018-08-10
修稿时间:2019-02-25

Clinical efficacy of ultrasound-guided interventional therapy for Morton neuroma
TAN Li,CHEN Kai,QUAN Jierong,ZHANG Yun and CHEN Qin. Clinical efficacy of ultrasound-guided interventional therapy for Morton neuroma[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology, 2019, 35(5): 750-753
Authors:TAN Li  CHEN Kai  QUAN Jierong  ZHANG Yun  CHEN Qin
Affiliation:Department of Ultrasound, Sichuan Academy of Medical Science & Sichuan Provincial People''s Hospital, Chengdu 610072, China,Department of Ultrasound, Sichuan Academy of Medical Science & Sichuan Provincial People''s Hospital, Chengdu 610072, China,Department of Ultrasound, Sichuan Academy of Medical Science & Sichuan Provincial People''s Hospital, Chengdu 610072, China,Department of Orthopedics and Traditional Chinese Medicine, Sichuan Academy of Medical Science & Sichuan Provincial People''s Hospital, Chengdu 610072, China and Department of Ultrasound, Sichuan Academy of Medical Science & Sichuan Provincial People''s Hospital, Chengdu 610072, China
Abstract:Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of ultrasound-guided interventional therapy for Morton neuroma. Methods All 36 patients with Morton neuroma were randomly divided into observation group (n=19) and control group (n=17). The patients of observation group were given ultrasound-guided interventional therapy, while the patients of control group were treated with traditional occlusive therapy. Vascular and tendon injuries during therapy, infection and other complications during 8 weeks after treatment were observed. Numerical rating scale (NRS) were assessed before treatment and 4 weeks and 8 weeks after treatment, and the maximum diameter of tumor before treatment and 8 weeks after treatment were compared. Results No complications such as vascular and tendon injuries were observed in 2 groups during treatment. Six patients in control group had local infection during 8 weeks after treatment, which were relieved after symptomatic treatment. In observation group, NRS scores decreased obviously in 4 weeks and 8 weeks after treatment compared with before treatment (both P<0.01). Compared with that before treatment, NRS score of 4 weeks after treatment decreased in control group (P<0.01), while no significant difference was found between 8 weeks after treatment and before treatment (P>0.05), as well as between 8 weeks and 4 weeks after treatment (P>0.05). There was no significant difference of NRS scores before treatment and 4 weeks after treatment in both 2 groups (both P>0.05), while NRS score of observation group decreased compared with control group 8 weeks after treatment (P<0.001). The differences of the maximum diameter of tumors before treatment and 8 weeks after treatment were not statistically significant between 2 groups (both P>0.05). Conclusion Ultrasound-guided intervention is efficacy and safety in treatment of Morton neuroma.
Keywords:neuroma, Morton  metatarsus  ultrasonography, interventional
点击此处可从《中国医学影像技术》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国医学影像技术》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号