首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

人工智能骨龄评测系统评估儿童腕骨骨龄
引用本文:康敏,王齐艳,蒲杨梅,丁立,邹雪瑾. 人工智能骨龄评测系统评估儿童腕骨骨龄[J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2019, 35(12): 1804-1807
作者姓名:康敏  王齐艳  蒲杨梅  丁立  邹雪瑾
作者单位:四川省妇幼保健院放射科, 四川 成都 610042,四川省妇幼保健院放射科, 四川 成都 610042,四川省妇幼保健院放射科, 四川 成都 610042,四川省妇幼保健院放射科, 四川 成都 610042,四川省妇幼保健院放射科, 四川 成都 610042
摘    要:目的 探讨人工智能(AI)系统评测儿童腕骨骨龄的可行性。方法 回顾性分析130幅1~13岁儿童左手骨龄X线片。以3名中高年资放射科医师腕骨骨龄评测结果为参考标准,计算并对比AI系统(简称模型)及3名低年资放射科医师(医师1、2、3,简称医师)与参考标准之间腕骨骨龄和腕骨成熟度分值的均方根误差(RMSE)及平均绝对误差(MAE);采用组内相关系数(ICC)评价模型、医师与参考标准之间评测骨龄结果的一致性;比较模型与医师间骨龄测评时间。结果 模型与参考标准之间腕骨骨龄的MAE、RMSE与医师1、2与参考标准之间MAE、RMSE差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05),与医师3的MAE、RMSE差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。模型与参考标准之间腕骨成熟度分值的MAE、RMSE与医师1、参考标准之间MAE、RMSE差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05),与医师2、3的MAE、RMSE差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。模型与参考标准之间腕骨骨龄评测结果的ICC=0.997,医师1、2、3与参考标准之间ICC分别为0.994、0.996、0.997。模型对骨龄的测评时间均小于医师(P均<0.001)。结论 AI骨龄评测系统能够准确、快速评估儿童腕骨骨龄。

关 键 词:年龄测定,骨骼  腕骨  深度学习  儿童  体层摄影术,X线计算机
收稿时间:2019-07-09
修稿时间:2019-09-26

Artificial intelligence system for assessment of children carpal bone age
KANG Min,WANG Qiyan,PU Yangmei,DING Li and ZOU Xuejin. Artificial intelligence system for assessment of children carpal bone age[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology, 2019, 35(12): 1804-1807
Authors:KANG Min  WANG Qiyan  PU Yangmei  DING Li  ZOU Xuejin
Affiliation:Department of Radiology, Sichuan Province Hospital for Women and Children, Chengdu 610042, China,Department of Radiology, Sichuan Province Hospital for Women and Children, Chengdu 610042, China,Department of Radiology, Sichuan Province Hospital for Women and Children, Chengdu 610042, China,Department of Radiology, Sichuan Province Hospital for Women and Children, Chengdu 610042, China and Department of Radiology, Sichuan Province Hospital for Women and Children, Chengdu 610042, China
Abstract:Objective To observe the clinical feasibility of carpal bone age assessment (BAA) using artificial intelligence (AI) system. Methods Totally 130 hand-wrist radiographs of children aged 1-13 years were retrospectively studied. Carpal bone ages estimated by three senior radiologists were taken as reference standards. The root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE) of carpal bone age estimations and carpal maturity scores relative to the reference standard were calculated and compared between AI system (model) and 3 junior radiologists (physician 1, 2, 3),respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to test the agreement of BAA among the model, physicians and reference standards. BAA time was also compared between model and physicians,respectively. Results There were significant differences of carpal BAA''s MAE and RMSE of model and physician 1, 2 (all P<0.001), but not between model and physician 3 (all P>0.05). There were significant differences of carpal maturity score''s MAE and RMSE between model and physicians 1 (both P<0.05), while no significant difference was found between model and physician 2, 3 (all P>0.05). ICC between BAA of AI and reference standards was 0.997, between physician 1, 2, 3 and reference standards was 0.994, 0.996 and 0.997, respectively. BAA time of AI was significantly shorter than that of three physicians (all P<0.05). Conclusion Using AI BAA system can fast estimate carpal bone age with high accuracy.
Keywords:age determination by skeleton  carpal bones  deep learning  child  tomography, X-ray computed
点击此处可从《中国医学影像技术》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国医学影像技术》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号