首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

八段锦对骨质疏松症患者干预效果的Meta分析
引用本文:李小燕 云洁 何杰 秦花 王荻 李婷. 八段锦对骨质疏松症患者干预效果的Meta分析[J]. 中国骨质疏松杂志, 2020, 0(1): 37-43
作者姓名:李小燕 云洁 何杰 秦花 王荻 李婷
作者单位:1.成都中医药大学,四川 成都 610072 2.成都中医药大学附属医院,四川 成都 6100723.成都医学院第一附属医院,四川 成都 610500
基金项目:国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(81602821)
摘    要:目的针对八段锦对骨质疏松症患者的干预效果进行系统评价。方法计算机检索PubMed、The Cochrane Library、EMbase、CBM、CNKI、维普、万方等数据库,纳入符合标准的RCT,检索时间从建库至2019年1月。由两位研究者按照纳入和排除标准独立进行文献筛选、提取资料及质量评价,应用RevM an 5. 3、Stata 12. 0统计软件进行Meta分析。结果合计纳入15项RCT,包括1 154名研究对象。Meta分析结果显示,与对照组相比,八段锦组提高了骨质疏松患者的总有效率、血清骨钙素水平(BGP)、血清碱性磷酸酶(ALP),降低了患者的疼痛评分(VAS),差异有统计学意义(P0. 05);在血清Ca~(2+)水平方面,两组患者无明显差异。在提高骨密度(bone mineral density,BMD)方面,八段锦组优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0. 05);但亚组分析显示腰椎BMD差异有统计学意义,股骨颈BMD差异无统计学意义。结论八段锦运动治疗骨质疏松症具有良好疗效,但纳入研究数量、质量有限,尚需要高质量、大样本的随机对照试验加以证实。

关 键 词:八段锦;骨质疏松症;随机对照试验;系统评价;Meta分析

Meta-analysis of the effects of Baduanjin on patients with osteoporosis
LI Xiaoyan,YUN Jie,HE Jie,QIN Hu,WANG Di,LI Ting. Meta-analysis of the effects of Baduanjin on patients with osteoporosis[J]. Chinese Journal of Osteoporosis, 2020, 0(1): 37-43
Authors:LI Xiaoyan  YUN Jie  HE Jie  QIN Hu  WANG Di  LI Ting
Affiliation:1. Chengdu University of TCM, Chengdu 6100722. Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University of TCM, Chengdu 6100723. First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu 610500, China
Abstract:Objective To estimate the effects of Baduanjin on patients with osteoporosis systematically. Methods PubMed, The Cochrane Library, EMbase, CBM, CNKI, VIP, Wanfang Database and other databases were searched by computer for RCTs met the inclusion criteria. The retrieval time was from the establishment of the database to January 2019. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data and evaluated the quality according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Meta-analysis was performed by RevMan 5.3, Stata12.0 statistical software. Results In total 15 RCTs were included, involving 1154 patients. Meta-analysis revealed that compared with the control group, Baduanjin group had increased total effective rate in osteoporosis patients, increased serum osteocalcin level (BGP) and serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and decreased pain score of patients (VAS), with statistical significance. The two groups had no significant difference in serum Ca2+ level. In terms of improving bone mineral density (BMD), Baduanjin group was better than the control group, which was statistically significant. However, subgroup analysis suggested that the effect on lumbar spine bone density was statistically significant, but femoral neck bone density showed no significant difference. Conclusion Baduanjin exercise has a good efficacy in the treatment of osteoporosis, which is limited by the quantity and quality of the studies, and needs to be confirmed by high-quality, large-sample randomized controlled trials.
Keywords:Baduanjin   osteoporosis   randomized controlled trial   systematic review   meta-analysis
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国骨质疏松杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国骨质疏松杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号