Celsior液与UW液对无心跳大鼠供肝保存效果的比较

目的 比较Celsior(CS)液与UW液对大鼠无心跳供者(NHBD)供肝的保存效果.方法 选取健康雄性SD大鼠作为肝移植的供、受者.通过阻断大鼠主动脉和膈上下腔静脉10 min的方法,制备和获取NHBD供肝,并采用不同的器官保存液灌注和冷保存供肝.随机将受者分为4组.CS8 h组:受者采用经CS液灌注和冷保存8 h的供肝移植;UW8 h组:受者采用经UW液灌注和冷保存8 h的供肝移植;CS16 h组:受者采用经CS液灌注和冷保存16 h的供肝移植;UW16 h组:受者采用经UW液灌注和冷保存16 h的供肝移植.受者门静脉开放前、开放后1、3及6 h,取各组受者的静脉血检测血清丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT)、天冬氨酸转氨酶(AST)、内皮素1(ET-1)、白细胞介素1(IL-1)及肿瘤坏死因子α(TNF-α)水平;观察和比较各组受者的胆汁生成量、移植肝组织病理学改变及术后7 d内的存活率.结果 NHBD供肝经UW液灌注后呈"花斑"状,肝叶边缘灌注不良,经CS液灌注后肝叶边缘灌注良好.CS8 h组和UW8 h组受者的胆汁生成量分别为(0.21±0.01)ml和(0.10±0.02)ml(P<0.05).门静脉开放后1、3及6 h,CS8 h组受者的血清ALT及AST水平明显低于UW8 h组(P<0.05),门静脉开放后1、3h,CS8 h组受者的血清ET-1、IL-1及TNF-α水平均明显低于UW8 h组(P<0.05);CS8 h组受者移植肝肝窦扩张、门静脉充血及炎症细胞浸润等病理学改变明显轻于UW8 h组,CS8 h组和UW8 h组受者术后7 d的存活率分别为58.3%和25.0%(P<0.05).CS16 h组和UW16 h组受者各时点的胆汁分泌量、血清ALT、AST、ET-1、IL-1及TNF-α水平的比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),两组受者均在术后3 d内死亡,两组受者移植肝组织病理学改变无明显差异.结论 CS液对大鼠NHBD供肝的保存效果优于UW液,这可能与UW液较CS液粘稠及CS液能够减少枯否细胞的激活有关;NHBD供肝的冷保存时间不宜超过16 h.

Comparison of Celsior solution vs UW solution on preservation of livers from non-heart-beating rats

Objective To compare the effects of Celsior (CS) solution vs University of Wisconsin (UW) solution on preservation of non-heart- beating donor (NHBD) livers in rats. Methods The healthy male SD rats were taken as donors and recipients. The thoracic descending aorta and supradiaphragmatic inferior vena cava were cross-clamped for 10 min to induce ischemia as a NHBD model. After flushed with the cold CS or UW solution, NHBD livers were stored at 4℃ for 8 h or 16 h. Then they were transplanted using the two-cuff technique with arterial reconstruction. Accordingly, the recipients were divided into four groups: CS 8 h, UW 8 h, CS 16 h and UW 16 h groups. The bile discharge, liver enzymes (ALT and AST), ET-1, IL-1 and TNF-alpha levels in serum at 1, 3, and 6 h after reperfusion were measured. Histopathological examination was carried out by HE staining, and the 7-day survival rate was observed. Results As compared with a homogenous appearance in the NHBD livers perfused with CS solution, the NHBD livers perfused with UW solution showed a heterogenous appearance, with more or less mottling. In the CS 8 h group there were more bile discharge at 1 h, lower ALT and AST levels at 1, 3 and 6 h, and lower serum ET-1, IL-1 and TNF-alpha ? levels at 1 and 3 h after reperfusion than the UW 8 h group (P<0.05). Histopathological examination showed a well-preserved hepatic architecture, milder portal congestion and inflammatory infiltration in CS 8 h group as compared with UW 8 h group. The 7-day survival rate in CS 8 h and UW 8 h groups was 58.3% and 25.0% respectively (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in bile discharge, ALT, AST, ET-1, IL-1 and TNF-alpha ? levels at different time points between CS 16 h and UW 16 h groups (P>0.05), and histopathological examination showed no much difference in the tissue damage between two groups; all recipients died within 3 days (P>0.05). Conclusion CS was more effective than UW in preserving NHBD livers after 8 h of cold storage, which may be due to the better perfusion of CS and inhibition of Kupffer cells, but it had better preserve NHBD livers with CS no more than 16 h.